January 28, 2011

SEX




Prabhupada: Yes, that is bhakti-yoga. In this ordinary yoga system as it will be explained in this chapter, one has to strictly follow the life of celibacy. But in the bhakti-yoga system the whole idea is that you have to fix up your mind in Krsna. So whatever position, householder life does not mean to indulge in sex enjoyment. A householder may have wife, may have sex life, but that is for having children only, that's all. A householder does not mean he gets license to legalize prostitution. That is not householder. Householder can simply have sex life to beget nice child, that's all, no more. That is householder life; completely controlled. Householder does not mean whenever he has got this machine and he can use it. No. Householder, husband and wife, both Krsna conscious, engaged in Krsna conscious business, but when they require a child, Krsna conscious, that's all. That is also voluntary contraceptive method. One or two or three children, that's all, no more. So householder life does not mean sex life without any restriction. But for spiritual life one who wants to advance in spiritual life, either you accept this bhakti-yoga system or this astanga-yoga system or jnana-yoga system, sex indulgence unrestricted is never there. Sex indulgence means you have to come back again. If you try to enjoy the senses, that is materialistic way of life.


Materialistic way of life is that I have got nice senses, let me enjoy the senses to the fullest extent. That is materialistic way of life. Just like cats, dogs, and hogs. The hogs, whenever they are sexually inclined, they don't care for whether it is his mother or sister or this or that. You see? That is stated in the Srimad-Bhagavatam: nayam deho deha-bhajam nrloke kastan kaman arhate vid-bhujam ye [SB 5.5.1]. Vid-bhujam, vid means stool and bhujam means eater. So the stool-eater's sense gratification is not meant for this human form of life. Stool-eater means these hogs. The hogs sense gratification is not meant for this human form of life. Restriction. Therefore in the human form of life there is marriage system. Why? What is the marriage and prostitution? Marriage system means restricting sex life. Marriage system does not mean that you get a wife, ah, without any payment you go on unrestricted sex life. No, that is not marriage. Marriage means to restrict your sex life. He'll hunt for sex life here and there—no, you cannot do that. Here is your wife and that is only for child. It is restriction. (Bg class 6.46-47 1969)

January 25, 2011

REPRESION IS NOT ALWAYS BAD



Syamasundara: I heard you say once that we cannot really repress desire but we have to channel it, control it, into other objects.

Prabhupada: Repression means, suppose you have a disease, you are suffering from typhoid fever, and the doctor says that you don't take any solid food. Now if you desire to take a paratha, you have to repress it: "No, I cannot take paratha." Suppose there is looseness of your bile(?), and if you want to take some condensed milk, you have to repress it. (indistinct) go against you, you have to repress. Repress means repressing something which is going against my welfare. So in this brahmacäré system also there is repression. He should not see young woman, he should not sit down with young woman. But he desires. The desire is that "I shall see young woman." He has to repress. So this is called tapasya, voluntary repression.

Syamasundara: Aren't these desires given outlet in other ways? Do we channel the desires to some other field? Instead of seeing a beautiful woman, we see the beautiful form of Krsna, like that?

Prabhupada: That is our process. From this (indistinct) if you have got better engagement, you give up inferior engagement. When you are captivated by seeing the beautiful form of Krsna, naturally you have no more desire to see the beautiful form of a young woman.

Syamasundara: The Buddhists also say repress desires, but they mean total repression.

Prabhupada: Yes. We don't say that. We just say that sometimes there is strong desire, we have to repress it. Just like my Guru Maharaja used to say that while you get up from bed, you beat your mind a hundred times with your shoe, and when you go to bed, you beat your mind a hundred times with a broomstick. Then you will be able to control your mind. Sometimes, just like wild tiger, they have got him to control by repression. The circus players, they do that. Because it is wild tiger, repression is required. But when it is under control, there is no question of repression. You can play with the tiger; he becomes your friend. So repression is not always bad.

January 23, 2011

Notes On The Bhagavata

By Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura






The Fruitless Reader & The Shallow Critic

1. We love to read a book which we never read before. We are anxious to gather whatever information is contained in it and with such acquirement our curiosity stops. This mode of study prevails amongst a great number of readers, who are great men in their own estimation as well as in the estimation of those who are of their own stamp. In fact, most readers are mere repositories of facts and statements made by other people. But this is not study. The student is to read the facts with a view to create, and not with the object of fruitless retention.

2. Students like satellites should reflect whatever light they they receive from authors and not imprison the facts and thoughts.... Thought is progressive. The author's thought must have progress in the reader in the shape of correction or development. He is the best critic who can show the further development of an old thought; but a mere denouncer is the enemy of progress and consequently of Nature.

3. "Begin anew," says the critic, because the old masonry does not answer at present. Let the old author be buried because his time is gone. These are shallow expressions. Progress is certainly the law of nature and there must be corrections and developments with the progress of time. But progress means going further or rising higher.

4. Now, if we are to follow our foolish critic, we are to go back to our former terminus and make a new race, and when we have run half the race, another critic of his stamp will cry out: "Begin anew because the wrong road has been taken. In this way our stupid critics will never allow us to go over the whole road and see what is in the other terminus. Thus the shallow critic and the fruitless reader are the two great enemies of progress. We must shun them.

The True Critic & The Useful Reader

1. The true critic, on the other hand, advises us to preserve what we have already obtained, and to adjust our race from that point where we have arrived in the heat of our progress. He will never advise us to go back to the point whence we started as he fully knows that in that case there will be a fruitless loss of our valuable time and labor. He will direct the adjustment of the angle of the race at the point where we are.


2. This is also the characteristic of the useful student. He will read an old author and will find out his exact position in the progress of thought. He will never propose to burn the book on the ground that it contains thoughts which are useless. No thought is useless. Thoughts are means by which we attain our objects. The reader who denounces a bad thought does not know that a bad road is even capable of improvement and conversion into a good one.

3. Thoughts will necessarily continue to be an endless series of means and objects in the progress of humanity. The great reformers will always assert that they have come out not to destroy the old law, but to fulfill it. Valmiki, Vyasa, Plato, Jesus, Mohamed, Confucius and Caitanya Mahaprabhu assert the fact either expressly or by their conduct.

January 20, 2011

THE POWER OF FAITH

by David Norman Willmott



Prabhupada said: eighteen days and we could take the government.
Everyone has faith in something, faith even in doubt, fear, despair. Krsna reciprocates with our faith. Faith is need and if you need something bad enough, it happens. You do whatever it takes. If the oasis is five miles away, you don't flop down on the roadside and cry that you'll never be able to have a drink. You walk — if you need to live. It takes some effort, some patience, some FAITH… but you walk. If you’re in jail and you know a way out, then every day you can chip away. I have to accept that I’m in jail and there’s no quick and easy way out. However long it takes, however little closer I can get, every day I do something to escape and one day I will — because I know where I am, where I want to be, and how I can get there… And devotional service lets you out of jail in one step.

Even if your destination is a long way off, you can be peaceful while travelling there, because of faith; because your destination is sure; because you’re on the right path. You are excited: “I’m going to such and such a place… goody goody”… rubbing my hands together. Maybe I’m a million miles away, but I’m on the plane, I’m on the way. And for a lot of people, the journey is the most interesting thing about going somewhere.
When the magnets of sambandha & prayojana are strongly attracted, then abhidheya is very dynamic. That abhidheya — which is saturated with intense faith — can move mountains if need be.
How do you get to need? And how does feeling turn into willing? — By contemplation; by purposefully considering a relationship and an outcome that you intend to bring into physical experience; by accepting the inevitability of an idea bound up in the "future".
Contemplation fosters attachment (need). Attachment spawns action. Action bears fruits for the present. Those fruits initiate further action.

The ultimate abhidheya is stated in "tivrena bhakti-yogena". Such a doer of abhidheya would have faith that the purusam param, Krsna, is the master of all relationships and experiences (outcomes). Such an actor would find all needs in Him and find Him in all things.

What sets contemplation apart from dreaming? — FAITH: faith in a relationship and the experience it promises.

I want to ask Krsna for all the things that will make me happy, or rather I should say: peaceful. But I don't ask. I'm afraid I'll actually get them, because if I had all the right facilities and relationships that allowed me to be happy executing my natural work, then I'd think there was something wrong. My false ego would be out of a job. I'd be out of an excuse to hate the world, myself, and God. I'd have to stop taking pleasure in being a poor fellow and feeling sad about it. I'd have to give up feeling justified being selfish and alone and hating everyone and everything because they all suck. I would have to cease reveling in being a victim with an injustice to put right and a cause to wage war with. I could no longer live with myself when I choose to assert my independence and excellence above all others — when I flaunt my foolishness in the presence of the Lord. I couldn't accept His blessings because I would have to feel ashamed. I couldn't accept the gifts of God because I would have to acknowledge his existence, and moreover that He's a nice person who likes me, somehow loves me, even as I don't want to like Him, even as I envy Him and am determined to control and enjoy without Him, and even as I'm killing the soul and trying to kill Him.

So I don't ask, because I'm faithless. I have no faith in my happy relationship with God. Why? —ILLUSION, IGNORNCE, FALSE EGO, ANGER, ENVY… demoniac qualities, the vyasti consciousness of a separatist. This is insane. I want to be happy. I want to do my natural work for His glorification, and I want the facilities and relationships that let me get on with that comfortably, that let me be peaceful but sober. I don't need to waste my time figuring out how to tear up floors, doors and windows or running in circles to get the guys who do and won't absolutely rip me off. I JUST WANT TO DO MY OWN WORK, and I want a nice conducive daily environment. I'm attached to serving Krsna in a certain way—sorry—therefore I dislike things that get in my way. So maybe it's His mercy that I'm thwarted and frustrated. Maybe He wants me to become completely surrendered—detached from both the results and the nature of my work—and this is His method: to annoy the hell out of me with half or more-than-half empty glasses when only a full pint would soothe this ego… But that's not the full picture, is it? The only person creating all this is me. I can easily have what I need to serve Krsna. I’m just not resolved on serving Him. Attachment is cured by Krsna conscious engagement. So it all actually comes back to me. I need to go to Him for my all other needs. Right now I need humility and faith. I HAVE TO ASK , properly. I have to have austerity. When I get, if I get, then I'll take the Giver in the gift, and maybe He won't mind giving to me again.

Why am I still not asking? Because I think I don't deserve what I wish I could ask for. I don't believe Krsna would give it to me. I guess that's why: "First deserve. Then desire." But what is ‘deserving’? — Austerity. And the result of proper austerity is FAITH, in God. Therefore to have faith is to deserve. Deserving can be having faith that even though I don't deserve this, I can ask it from Krsna because He is the Supreme Controller and Enjoyer. So whatever I get will be engaged to serve and remember Him. You can deserve it if you actually will use it properly. And Krsna knows if you will. He knows my faith.

When an individual gets an arbitrary advantage that catalyzes further advantages to the increasing disadvantage of others, a sociologist calls it “the Matthew effect”:

“For unto everyone that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance. But from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath” (Matthew 25:29).

I remember being puzzled by this biblical verse. I thought it was unfair; I didn’t get it. What was God’s reasoning? Then I thought, “Well everyone has something, or how could ‘even that which he hath’ be taken away?” So who is it that ‘hath not’? I figure it’s the person who doesn’t notice what he has; the person who never has enough and is always absorbed in what he doesn’t have — in other words: a miser (etymologically ‘unfortunate’). A miser can’t appreciate what he has and so he doesn’t use it and has to lose it. He has so much faith in what he doesn’t have that Krsna reciprocates to make it true. (If a man doesn’t appreciate his wife and imagines something else… then he won’t have a wife even if he’s married) And the person ‘that hath’ is he that knows it, because ‘having’ is a mentality. Someone can have a lot and feel poor; another can have a little and feel wealthy. The person that appreciates what he has is eligible to get more because if he has something he can share it or give it and his charity will attract more wealth. If he thinks he needs to keep it, he never really had it. So because he feels secure, he can make others secure and feel himself secure in abundance. Unto every devotee who knows that Krsna maintains him, unto him who sees everything in Krsna’s service — unto him shall be given, and he shall have abundance.

Krsna responds to my faith. I might ask, but only faith gets. If I really have faith, then I seriously ask… and keep asking.

But why not just dream? What's so much better about the jagat (gross material) experience? — Well… why didn’t creation stop at the primary level? Why not be satisfied looking at the map? Who needs to go and explore? …If you want a full experience of ahankara, then you have to go with ahankara to its fullest expression, i.e. the gross. The jagat experience is also a dream. But who would argue that it isn’t more intense than the one you make in sleep?

Dreaming is desire, but realization is the meeting of need, so you tell me: Why aren’t you satisfied with dreaming out your desires? — It’s because imagination seems under your control, and that kind of fun has its limits. You can do anything you like, create an entire world, but you’re only ever working with three out of eight elements, so there’s a lot missing. What’s missing is the unpredictable interaction of the Lord in His form as the potency around you. She changes shape according to how you want to experience Krsna, His qualities. You try to use Her to get to His qualities, and she keeps you chasing shadows. You try to serve Her in serving Krsna, and She takes you to His lotus feet; You will see Him everywhere. You’ll realize Him. Krsna is the essence of any need. What you are seeking is only an aspect of Him. So why do you want to REAL-ise your attractions? — Because only Krsna is real.

Six months. That’s all. The Lord appeared to Dhruva in six months. “Oh, but that was another age. So much merit was available. So much determination was possible. Now we cannot perform this astanga-yoga. Who can focus so sharply and cease all bodily functions? Who can stop breathing and get the Lord’s darshana?” You can’t of course, but guess what? You don’t need to. This is another age and the best of ages at that: Because simply by sankirtana, the highest thing can be attained. If by following a process of meditation that usually takes tens of thousands of years to perfect, Dhruva was successful in six months by his condensed faith and his chanting of the Lord’s name, then how much more quickly can we progress by constantly taking His names in an age when such chanting is the rocket fuel for escaping this atmosphere? The intense application of bhakti-yoga attracts even more-so the Lord’s mercy in this age and in the wake of the flood of divine love released by the most merciful Lord Himself, Gauranga Mahaprabhu. Whether one is desireless for mundane life, or has every desire under the sun, or desires to escape from the mundane atmosphere, the infallible prescription is the same in all circumstances: Just give yourself to the Supreme person. And how should you do that? — By tivra bhakti-yoga: sharp, fixed, focused, intense, condensed devotional service. Make every moment a strenuous attempt to give pleasure to the Lord according to your duty and the instructions of Sri Guru… Maybe you have a need, maybe you have several. How will you be relieved of them? — Only by Krsna’s grace. And what can you do to get His grace sooner rather than later? You can give Him your intense dedication… Six months is nothing. The question is: Do you have the faith in Krsna to bother?

I said to a devotee: "It's a matter of faith. Krsna is ready. But in my heart is doubt, and faithlessness." He said to me, "Krsna likes it when we take risks for Him, isn't it? Then you'll see Him." And I thought about it: That small boy who immediately got Gopal — he put unflinching faith in his mother's words; and he also entered the forest... alone.

So it dawned on me that faith is proved by action. It IS action. You can't say, "Yes, I have faith. So why is it all not happening? I'm asking God, but He's not helping." No. He reciprocates with our faith. And if you have the faith—if you actually do—then you'll act on it; you'll take a chance on Him. He stepped first (as all good males do): He made Himself available and He advertised His kindness. Now the ball's in your court. What do you want? A second ball, a third one..... And then maybe you'll hit the first? ...You want the ball again from Krsna? First you have to hit it back!! And if you want to play with five balls, ten balls, fifty balls… you better learn how to play with one. …We can't have Krsna scoring aces against us all the time now can we? I mean where's the fun in it? …Everyone likes a good 'on the edge of their seats' rally :)

At the initiation of a disciple into chanting the maha-mantra, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura instructed that Krsna should be allowed to land in our hearts, just as an army is landed by the navy... Then the fight begins! Maya has erected her high walls on all sides, but Krsna is a thief, and gradually He will capture the whole thing.

ON SEEING KRSNA

by Jayasacinandana das




In the following discussion Prabhupada argues with professor Durckheim that to understand the fact that we are not the body, knowledge is more important than experience.

Professor Durckheim: And yet isn't there difficulty. You can already have understood very well that you are not the body, but as long, for instance, as you have still fear of death, you didn't understand that experience. As soon as you understood by experience, you have no fear of death because you know that you can't die.

Prabhupada: So experience is received by higher knowledge. Experience means higher knowledge. Just like a child...

Professor Durckheim: Experience means...

Prabhupada: Higher knowledge. Higher knowledge.

Professor Durckheim: As soon as you have the experience, you get the higher knowledge.

Prabhupada: Yes. So the more you are highly elevated in knowledge, your experience is perfect.

Professor Durckheim: I would like to say the other way around: As more as you advance in experience, the more you have higher knowledge.

Prabhupada: But experience, it may be slow. But higher knowledge you can get immediately.

There is a verbal tag-of-war here. To be clear, Prabhupada was not against spiritual realization. He writes in the purport of the Gita's verse 6.8 that a living entity is fully satisfied only if the knowledge is realized. Also, quoting the verse that nobody can understand Krishna with the corrupted senses, Prabhupada went on to dismiss aggregating ordinary knowledge, because by mere academic knowledge one can be easily deluded and confused by apparent contradictions. The right way, in line with the Gaudiya Vaisnava school, is to learn and apply, as Prabhupada calls it, higher knowledge. That higher knowledge is left by the parampara. Prabhupada indeed writes: Only the bona fide, transcendental spiritual master is capable of demonstrating pure knowledge of the self. The conclusion is that even the spiritual realization, which is individual and personal, needs to be aligned with the disciplic succession. Prabhupada left to us clear and perfect teaching, with no room for straying away or speculating.

The verse and the purport of the Srimad Bhagavatam (8.5.25) perfectly illustrate this:
There [at Svetadvipa], Lord Brahma offered prayers to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, even though he had never seen the Supreme Lord. Simply because Lord Brahma had heard about the Supreme Personality of Godhead from Vedic literature, with a fixed mind he offered the Lord prayers as written or approved by Vedic literature.

PURPORT
It is said that when Brahma and the other demigods go to see the Supreme Personality of Godhead in Svetadvipa, they cannot directly see Him, but their prayers are heard by the Lord, and the needful action is taken. This we have seen in many instances. The word sruta-purvaya is significant. We get experience by directly seeing or by hearing. If it is not possible to see someone directly, we can hear about him from authentic sources. Sometimes people ask whether we can show them God. This is ludicrous. It is not necessary for one to see God before he can accept God. Our sensory perception is always incomplete. Therefore, even if we see God, we may not be able to understand Him. When Krsna was on earth, many, many people saw Him but could not understand that He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Avajananti mam mudha manusim tanum asritam [Bg. 9.11]. Even though the rascals and fools saw Krsna personally, they could not understand that He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Even upon seeing God personally, one who is unfortunate cannot understand Him. Therefore we have to hear about God, Krsna, from the authentic Vedic literature and from persons who understand the Vedic version properly. Even though Brahma had not seen the Supreme Personality of Godhead before, he was confident that the Lord was there in Svetadvipa. Thus he took the opportunity to go there and offer prayers to the Lord.

These prayers were not ordinary concocted prayers. Prayers must be approved by Vedic literature, as indicated in this verse by the words daivibhir girbhih. In our Krsna consciousness movement we do not allow any song that has not been approved or sung by bona fide devotees. We cannot allow cinema songs to be sung in the temple. We generally sing two songs. One is sri-krsna-caitanya prabhu nityananda sri-advaita gadadhara srivasadi-gaura-bhakta-vrnda. This is bona fide. It is always mentioned in the Caitanya-caritamrta, and it is accepted by the acaryas. The other, of course, is the maha-mantra—Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare/ Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare. We may also sing the songs of Narottama dasa Thakura, Bhaktivinoda Thakura and Locana dasa Thakura, but these two songs—sri-krsna-caitanya and the Hare Krsna maha-mantra—are sufficient to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead, although we cannot see Him. Seeing the Lord is not as important as appreciating Him from the authentic literature or the authentic statements of authorized persons.

January 17, 2011

Brahmacari class from ISKCON Chowpatty




Bhakti Vidya Purna Swami: …They may be indologists but they cannot make others follow the Indian culture. They can make someone else an armchair speculator, that they can do, but they cannot make someone else live the life of the knowledge that they teach. Because they don’t live it themselves.

Brahmacari means that you receive this knowledge and you must live it. Otherwise we can know hundreds and thousands of slokas, but it does not make us better brahmacaris unless we live these slokas. But at the same time to do all the nice activities of a brahmacati and not know why, that also will be short lived. Because now the sentiment goes in this way but later the sentiment goes in that way, I mean she was dressed in a very nice sari. Sentiment is like that, sentiment you cannot trust. Mind is controlled by intelligence, intelligence is controlled by consciousness. So just being sentimentally a nice guy is good, is pious, but it is not perfect because it is changeable. Just as the mind engrossed in knowledge is changeable, speculation means it is changing and doing different things, also the mind engrossed in sentiment is changeable, because it is again the mind but without knowledge.

So one has to put the two together, that is brahmacari life, one studies and practices. First class brahmacari means his study is first class and his practice is first class. That makes a first class brahmacari. This is the common point for all first class brahmacaris. But the first class brahmacaris are divided in two groups. They are naistika, which means he will never get married, and upakurvana, which means he is a first class brahmacari who in the future will get married. But to get married, to be a good grihasta, first he has to be a good brahmacari. So, now, what is the difference between these two, it is a very simple thing, because there is no difference in training, the training is exactly the same for both of them. It is not that the one who is going to get married has to train how to match saris and cholis, it has nothing to do with this.

Devotees: (chuckling)

Bhakti Vidya Purna Swami: He must have the same training, the difference is in realization. You study, you practice and you will understand. In the Vedic literature there are three levels of study, there are actually four, but three are commonly known, the fourth is not so commonly known. The first is called sravana. We hear about the Vedic knowledge. That’s the first one. The next is called manana. We contemplate this knowledge and practice it. From practicing it we will get understanding. Nowadays people will call this understanding a realization, but it is not; realization is something else. Understanding means I intellectually know it and I know how to apply it. Someone does not know how to do something and then they understand it and they call this realization, but this is not realization, it is understanding. So that’s manana. The third stage is nididhyasana. One becomes fixed in that, that means what you understand becomes your life, that is your value, you will not do anything in a different way other than this. Understanding means that you know it but you may be living a different lifestyle. Like if you go to any open minded smoker, he knows that smoking is bad for him, he understands it, but he still smokes because he does not have a realization. When he gets a realization he will stop smoking because it has become his value. He does not have a realization and therefore he is still smoking.

So realization is the important thing. The whole point of the Vedic culture is to get that realization. Because with this realization you actually, full heartedly live that lifestyle. You commit yourself to go back home to Godhead. Not in a theoretical way but in a definite way. So now a brahmacari is fifty percent already back home to Godhead, that is there. This is the simplest, easiest way to follow. One just remains a brahmacari, like Narada Muni, he is a brahmacari. Many sages, risis, munis are brahmacaris. Or, sometimes for the preaching, there can be also accepting sannyasa. But the position of realization is the same.

Since this is the goal we want, this realization, it is something very valuable. If we can get it today or tomorrow, that is not important. We should obtain it as quickly as possible but if it is not possible today then we should obtain it tomorrow. So if you can get it today, that’s what we want, if you can obtain it tomorrow, that’s what we want. Of the two easiest is today, of course, but if not possible then – tomorrow.

Then we see that this is the meaning of the grihasta asram. Grihasta asram is for someone who has this knowledge, this practice, this understanding, but he does not have the realization. And therefore instead of learning just by hearing one has to learn by seeing. Therefore Prabhupada says that brahmacari is first class and grihasta is second class. It is not that the soul is second class, but just that the process that is used is second class, simply because you have to see it rather than hear it. It does not mean that the devotee is second class, means that of these two processes the seeing is inferior to hearing. Best is you hear it and by practice you get the realization. But if you are unable to do so then the grihasta asram is there to ensure you get it. The point is that we want realization, that’s all. So because of our previous activities, previous karma, we can get the realization by the brahmacari asram, or if we can’t then we should get it by the grihasta asram, they are both respected because they are human beings. Human being is respected. And those who follow the varnasrama are the real human beings. So this is respectable.
So it is not that one goes in the grihasta asram in ignorance. One goes there with full knowledge of the difficulties that are there and the problems that are there. And the closeness one is dealing with maya. But it is a risk one should take to get the realization. Because outside of it the whole concept of women is attractive. For a brahmacari who wants to get married any girl is a distraction, any situation, any opulence. But when he gets married then he becomes focused. So instead of thinking the whole day about married life he thinks about it only when it is necessary, and the rest of the time s free for sadhana. Just like on ekadashi, if one is not very advanced and he fasts then all he thinks is food. So better he eats and then with a full stomach he can be peaceful and do his sadhana. But if one is more practiced he can fast on ekadashi and have more time for sadhana, then it is conducive for his spiritual advancement.

The same is the situation with the brahmacari and the grihasta asram. If we find that the mind is going off because of the time immemorial dealings with this things, because you see, we are used to look from the perspective of only one lifetime, only this 50, 70, 100 years, and we think, this one is a brahmacari, that’s good, this one is a grihasta, well, what to do…But that is not the Brahman platform. This is not the actual thinking of real brahmacaris. The real brahmacari understands that we are talking about unlimited lifetimes, and now, suddenly in this lifetime we are trying to stop the whole process of eating, sleeping, mating, and defending. So something that has been going on so long may stop very easily, may not stop very easily. So what are these 20-30-40 years compared to eternity? Nothing. A child may complain, you tell him we are going outside for 5 min., for him 5 min is an eternity so he may complain. But for a mature adult 5 min. it is nothing. So in the same way 20 or 30 years or how long is one’s term, that is not very long. Therefore it’s not looked down upon. The point is that if one can avoid it one does, but if one can’t than it does not matter because at the end of it one is going to see each and every point Bhagavatam and sastra make, one is going to see it right in the front of one’s eyes, right in his life. One is going to see it there.

The whole point is that the men have an idea that the women are going to make them happy. Right? They are soft spoken, very gentle in their dealings, you know, fine in their movements, whatever they do is soft and fine and gentle. And men tend to be cut and dry, so there is very nice balance. Right? Men needs women, women needs men. So this is the difference – a brahmacari is not a man and is not a woman. Someone who can realize that he can remain a brahmacari, but someone who feels he is a man – then man needs woman.

Devotees: (chuckling)

Bhakti Vidya Purna Swami: Is that makes sense? So, OK… (Chuckling) So this is the thing, and then we think this woman will make us happy. Right? So from a distance they look really good. They are able to keep up the act really well. They are always doing nicely, always behaving nicely, everything. But the closer you get the more you find what’s the reality of what is a woman. A woman is simply a man who thought women were nice.

Devotees: (laughing)

Bhakti Vidya Purna Swami: (laughing) Right? And then they take birth as women. But they still have all the desires to control and to get all the things they want. Men – things for them come easily, this is their field, a man is there, he just collects things. And he things: “The emotion will make me happy. I have things, but the emotion will make me happy.” Woman moves in the realm of emotion and she thinks: “Things will make me happy”. So who has things? Men. So you link yourself up with a man and get all the stuff you want. So this is the problem.

So in the grihasta asram you see that what sastra says is exactly what is there. Exactly what is there. There is not even one point that has been missed. In other words it is not that “my wife is special”. Means they can hold out for a certain amount of time, they will keep you in this illusion but eventually they have the tendency, especially the more stuff they get and more confident they get, they let down their guard and let you see more than you should see.

Devotees: (laughing)

Bhakti Vidya Purna Swami: Right? But that’s the thing, if they follow the Vedic culture, the Vedic culture makes it so that the men and women aren’t together that much so you don’t see that much. You put man and woman always together you see what they are really quickly. If you keep them separately, different rooms, etc., then when they are together that mystic is there. But if they are always together that mystic goes away very quickly. But because we are so conditioned to it one can think, well, than the modern lifestyle is better because it blows away the mystic really fast, but the difficulty is that we don’t necessarily learn in three years. So when the thing with a girl blows out in 3 years because you follow a modern lifestyle, it lasts 2-3 years, but then this is not enough time and then we have a tendency to thing, well this girl was little rough, now this girl is very sweet and gentle and this and that. So the Vedic culture is that whatever the man foolishly thinks the women are, those things that are going to make him happy, if they follow the Vedic culture that’s what he sees of a woman. A nice, gentle, wonderful, submissive, you can go on and on and on glorifying all the great qualities, he sees that and then at the end of the day he sees – still I am not happy, still I am not satisfied. The depth of emotion women can go is not very deep. Let’s say we have one kilo of emotion. Let’s say now and again you manifest this one kilo. So how much do you have? One kilo. Let’s say you have one kilo but you manifest always only 10 gr. So how much you have? 10 gr. This is the point. What man is looking for in terms of emotions is one kilo, women can only offer 10 gr.
But it looks that they are the emotional species. But the depth of the emotion is very, very shallow. You scratch it and underneath, you don’t want to know what it is underneath. You can talk to the grihastas, or if you have very honest women they can tell you also, rare, but we see Urvasi, she lets the cat out of the bag…

Devotees: (chuckling)

Bhakti Vidya Purna Swami: You know, Pingala, Pingala also. In different sastras different women they say what is the nature. That’s the whole point – when you are dealing on the intellectual platform they are sitting on the emotional platform, and when you go to the emotional platform men go deeper than that and they are still sitting up here. So after many, many years the man puts 2+2 together and he finally gets 4. Before that he though it is 3 or 6 or 5, but finally he understands that they are two different species that have absolutely nothing to do with each other.

Devotees: (chuckling)

Bhakti Vidya Purna Swami: (chuckling) Like that. This is the goal of the whole grihasta asram – to come to this realization and then there is no looking back. So if you are convinced by hearing that’s the best, you are saving the time and the trouble. Otherwise the grihasta asram shows you direct, firsthand experience. Especially you come from those nice Indian families, so you don’t just see your own wife but you see your mothers in law, your sisters in law, your daughters in law, yours this in law, yours that in law, everybody else like this, five million different, and you see they are all the same. So therefore you can fully understand with confidence that “Yes, this is nonsense, this is maya!”
But we have to be very, very careful here because you have two things – attachment and repulsion and Krsna consciousness is something else. Brahmacari is neither attraction nor repulsion. Because repulsion is just that something went wrong so it does not work now but if you could make it work then you are interested. Of course, in the beginning the repulsion is a very good impetus. For example when the kids are yelling and screaming you thing that’s bad but if they were not yelling and screaming then you think, well, it is not so bad! That’s why it is good for the beginning but it cannot be your foundation for your whole brahmacari life. It cannot be that O, I read about all this things, it is so bad, but that’s for the beginning. We are on the intelligent platform and we see this is useless, but we have to go from this platform to the platform of Krsna consciousness, to the platform of actually having a taste for the holly name.

Because the soul must have a taste. You can get it on three platforms. First is the spiritual platform, it is called vaikuntha rasa. Or you can get it on the material emotional platform which is called svargia rasa. That means nice relationships in the family, in other words that means the five rasas but on the material platform through varnasrama. And the lowest is the parthiva rasa – the senses meet the sense objects. So the modern culture is based on parthiva rasa, the Vedic culture is based on svargia rasa, and the devotional culture is based on vaikuntha rasa. Daivi varnasrama mean to take these lower rasas and to engage them in vaikuntha rasa. So a grihasta after getting this realization he moves to vanaprastha and sannyasa, but now he does this with realization. And they have gone through this and now they can speak from realization, so it is very good for the preaching. But in order to do this we should have proper brahmacari training.

In other words everybody tries for naistika. And in due course of time it will become clear if he can make it or not. As Radhanatha Maharaja pointed out if someone decides to get married it is not fall down. As long as it is done with knowledge. If they just go out and engage in sense gratification then it is a fall down, but this is a fall down from devotional service. But to go from brahmacari to grihasta asram is not a fall down because this is a mature way to deal with one’s emotional needs.
So the grihastas respect the brahmacaris because they study, and they are absorbed in sadhana, their practices are good and have a good character. At the same time the brahmacaris respect the grihastas because they also practice nicely and because they are already on the next stage. For a upakurvana brahmacari the grihasta is the next stage. So they are more advanced than the upakurvana brahmacari. A naistika brahmacari already has the realization the upakurvana brahmacari and the grihasta try to get. So that means he will be respected by both of them. But still socially speaking the grihastas are like the parents and the brahmacaris are like the children. The grihastas take care for the needs of the brahmacaris. They arrange everything so that the brahmacaris are protected and they can study and preach. They are free just to study and preach. So we should be grateful to the grihastas for doing this. And in the grihasta asram everything goes nicely and there we get the next generation of brahmacaris. So everybody respect one another because everybody knows what is the position of everyone else in the progression of going back home back to Godhead.

The problem is that when we are looking from a mundane platform then we see that this position is better than that position, man is better than woman, brahmacari is better than grihasta, but from the transcendental position what is good for your going back to Godhead that is required and that is good. So for one person grihasta is the best for another person brahmacari is the best.
So here we discussed the grihasta asram, hope nobody mind, so by understanding the nature of the grihasta asram one will either understand what is there and be prepared, or he will decide firmly that he does not want to go there. If it is not explained then it looks attractive, they are independent, they do what they want, they go wherever they want…that is what is professed as. But that’s not exactly. The brahmacaris, you have to live where you are told to live, you do the activities you are told to do, go places where you are allowed to go, but as a grihasta I can make my own plan.

That is OK if a grihasta is a one person show. But the problem is grihasta means they are married to a wife. So now instead of the Temple president telling you where you will live, what you will dress, where you can go, now a woman is going to tell you. Like that. And minimum it costs you double as much.

Devotees: (chuckling)

Bhakti Vidya Purna Swami: So now if you want to go from here to Mayapur you will have to get two tickets, not one. And not only that, they will not want to get second unreserved; it’s got to be reserved. And they smoke and make noise, so it’s got to be air conditioned. Right? Therefore we say minimum as double. That’s on a good day. So when one has knowledge one can see – this is not what I want. It is not what my mind thinks it is. Therefore – brahmacari. Or one can say – o, so that’s what it is, I can deal with it, no problem, I can handle it, then this person will be a very good grihasta. But there is no illusion. Vedic culture does not give space for illusion. Therefore in the scripture the the strong and weak points of man and woman, the grihasta asram are made very clear and obvious.

Just as a side point, the reason why in the sastra it is said more about the bad side, not about the good side, is our tendency to have our own illusion about some things. Like for example we see it is very easy for someone to take up a bad habit but it is very difficult to take up a good habit. So we see that the bad habit therefore needs to be explained more. Therefore in Bhagavatam we have one chapter that describes the glory of women, the glory of the grihasta asram, like that. So that is the fact, it is not wrong. Someone in that position it is good for them. But because of the illusion we think it is there are so many other chapters in Bhagavatam which describe the disadvantages because when you are in illusion you don’t notice this things, they are going on but you don’t notice them. They have to be very strongly pointed out so that one will be aware that they are there. So we should be very careful not to use this things against each other – brahmacaris against grihastas, men againsta women, etc. Haribol.

January 13, 2011

On keeping it as it is

by Jayasacinandana das



Srila Prabhupada said:

“This is brahmana. We do not serve anyone, any merchant, officer, any... No. We chant Hare Krsna. That's all. If Krsna wants, He will give us food, or we shall starve. We are not going to serve. This is the proof. We are spending not less than twenty lakhs of rupees for maintaining our establishment throughout the whole world, but we do not know what is our next moment's income. We do not know... We have eaten today. We do not know whether we shall have any eatable next day. This is our position. If it is available, we shall eat; otherwise we shall starve. This is our position. Still, I don't seek any employment, "Give us some service to maintain our..." No, we don't do that. We never do that. When I was alone, I was not doing that. I was living alone. I had no income, no friend, no shelter. Since I left my home, since 1954, I never cared for anyone maintaining me. And there was no resource, fixed income, nothing of the sort. I depended on Krsna.”

To draw a parallel with the Srila Prabhupada’s thoughts, we should not philosophically serve, or tailor to fit in with any banausic scholar, politician, popular social movement, any… Not philosophically. Rather we should speak the Gaudiya Vaisnava siddhanta as it was spoken by our predecessors. The public may dislike it, even reject us, but we shall nevertheless speak. If there is anybody to listen we shall speak, otherwise we will talk to the four empty walls. Still, we will not seek “employment”, or recognition in the public eye, “Please accept us, we are also a genuine religion”. No, we don't do that. We never do that. We may lose our friend, shelter and income, but we will be depending on Krishna.

January 6, 2011

Promoting the Brahminical Cutlure - part 2

By Tulsi das


In the Bhagavad-gita the Lord describes the qualities of the brahmanas as follows:

samo damas tapah saucam
ksantir arjavam eva ca
jnanam vijianam astikyam
brahma-karma svabhava-jam

"Peacefulness, self-control, austerity, purity, tolerance, honesty, wisdom, knowledge, and religiousness—these are the qualities by which the brähmaëas work." (Bg. 18.42)

The most efficient way for spreading the brahminical culture is to engage the devotees and the general public in following different aspects of Yuga-dharma – harinam sankrtan. The performance of yuga- dharma will purify the heart and will reveal the spiritual and material identity:

harer nama harer nama
harer namaiva kevalam
kalau nasty eva nasty eva
nasty eva gatir anyatha
[Cc. Adi 17.21]

"In this age of quarrel and hypocrisy the only means of deliverance is chanting the holy name of the Lord. There is no other way. There is no other way. There is no other way."

Every devotee will be performing some brahminical activity in the realm of devotional service, but few will have a brahminical occupation as a means of livelihood.

What we can do for spreading the brahminical culture is to continue to connect the general public to ISKCON by harinam, book distribution, and other preaching programs. In the case of the devotees we can help by encouraging them to become more serious and efficient in their spiritual practice.

For those who are more brahminicaly inclined we can have specific courses which will deepen the understanding of the philosophy, will help them to improve their character, will train them in different areas of Vedic knowledge, and prepare them to become leaders of the society. For this purpose we can put even more emphasize on education in ISKCON.

A big problem we are facing at the moment, especially in the West, is that the devotees have a good grasp on the philosophy, but don’t understand and don’t follow the Vedic culture, which is the original culture followed in the spiritual world and the practical application of our philosophy. Prabhupada used to say that we are Vaisnavas by philosophy and Hindus by culture. The situation now often is that we are Vaisnavas by philosophy, but follow the mlecha “culture” we are born in. The Vedic culture teaches how to respect the Lord, the Vaisnavas, the brahmanas, and the cows, how to take care of guests, how to cook and serve prasadam, in other words how to have a sattvic lifestyle which is most convenient for developing Krishna consciousness. These elements of the culture are missing in many places in the West, especially in many small temples where there are no facilities for practical training.

We can help in this regard by encouraging the devotees to spend some time in the holly dham where they can learn the philosophy and the culture together. This will help them to develop sattvic lifestyle and replace their bad habits with good ones. In the beginning of ISKCON when we did not have temples in India, the first western devotees were staying in the houses of pious Hindus. Prabhupada would instruct them to take advantage and learn the culture. Also when Subhag Maharaja, who comes from very aristocratic Bengali family, joined the movement Srila Prabhupada told him: “Now you don’t forget everything that your parents thought you, you just add Krsna conschiousness to it”. This shows that Prabhupäda wanted the devotees to follow the brahminical (Vedic) culture.

The brahminical culture can be spread by training and engaging devotees in the service of the deity like puja, dressing, cooking, etc:

“yajan yajan pathan pathan danah pratigrahah”

Perhaps the best method for spreading the brahminical culture is to improve our own personal character. As Srila Prabhupada writes in his purport to Bhagavad-gita 8.28:

“After the student studies the Vedas under the master for some time—at least from from age five to twenty—he may become a man of perfect character. Study of the Vedas is not meant for the recreation of armchair speculators, but for the formation of character.”

Personal example is the best way to preach to others. We can demand from others only if we first change ourselves.

Promoting the Brahminical Culture - part 1

by Madhva das



The culture is the way of life, especially the general customs and beliefs, of a particular group of people at a particular time. The culture of the human society varies widely around the world and through the history. While reflecting the value system of the society, the culture simultaneously acts back on society’s members, influencing their thinking, values, choices etc. Thus the local culture of upbringing is conditioning the thinking, the acting and the interacting of the individuals from the very moment of their birth.
Being born in particular society, the individual receives his first initiation in the local culture by receiving a name. The name is already surcharged culturally, thus branding the individual as a representative of his nation, family etc. This already provokes strong sense of identification of the individual with his local and national background. The name giving is followed by learning the local language, code of dressing, customs, etiquette, moral, philosophy, values etc. of which the individual becomes more or less an embodiment. The family, the society, the educational system, the media are further imprinting culturally conditioned patterns of thinking and behavior.

And the problem with this is that we have a materialistic culture nowadays. It programs us to think, feel and act as materialists. It cultivates habits that are detrimental in the context of the low of karma.
With such background as ISKCON devotees, even after we accept the Gaudia-Vaishnavism, we still carry on many of our old, unwanted habits and convictions.
Fortunately the pure devotional service is ahaituki apratihata. It does not depend on anything material and cannot be obstructed by anything material.


Thus our background, whatever it may be, is not an obstacle which can stop our advancement in Krishna consciousness.
Nonetheless, if our bhakti lata is weak, our anarthas can significantly slow down its growth, as deeply rooted weeds in the garden of our hearts.
That’s why as part of the vaishnava culture we do accept a new name, hair-style, clothes etc. as new designations, so that they can overwrite the old ones, contaminated with materialistic identification (go-das/i). The new designations inspire us to identify ourselves as Krishna das/i. The replacement of our materialistic samskaras with new ones, connected with Krishna, can naturally be extended further by adopting the brahminical culture as something favorable for our service to Krishna. The brahminical culture is God–made, as integral part of the varnashrama system, while our materialistic background culture is man–made and full with defects. Varnashrama is effective and practical in its variations throughout the universe and exists since the Creation. The subtle point here is that even following this auspicious culture, we will get entangled if we do not see the connection of our activities with Krishna.
“Without protection of cows, brahminical culture cannot be maintained; and without brahminical culture, the aim of life cannot be fulfilled.”(SB 8.5.24, purport)
Daivi – varnashrama is particularly the system which is God centered and suitable for the society of devotees. The Brahminical culture is exalted, sophisticated and even though still material (being sattvic), with the brahminical qualities it cultivates, it is the perfect culture for the devotees.


The brahminical qualities of a surrendered devotee will protect him from aparadhas and will help him to perform his service. This is even truer in the beginning stages of our devotional service (kanishtha adhikari). In some services heaving and cultivating brahminical qualities is mandatory (pujari, cook etc.). The brahminical culture will further provide a perfect practical solution for the devotee’s needs as members of the society, particularly as:
- social interaction
- mental development
- physical health
- means of livelihood
The brahminical qualities are highly superior to the qualities we have cultivated, based on our background culture. But we should keep in mind that the brahminical qualities are the way we do our service and are not valuable on their own, without being engaged in Krishna’s service. Here is the Vaishnava sidhanta in this regard: “The status of a pure Vaishnava is transcendental to the brahminical culture” (SB 2.4.18, purport).
Concluding on the importance of the brahminical culture, we’ll recall that the brahmanas are the “head” of the Varnashrama society. Brahmanas can train and create ksatriyas, vaisyas and sudras. The opposite is not the case.


To promote this favorable brahminical culture in ISKCON, we suggest the following methods as very practical and effective:
- Every devotee in the Yatra to get the opportunity to serve the deities as pujari at least shortly and under the supervision of an expert pujari. This will make the devotees aware of the advantages of the brahminical qualities
when it comes to service in the altar (cleanliness, punctuality…). The brahminical behavior and qualities are necessary for one to be a pujari in ISKCON.

- Every devotee in the Yatra to get the opportunity to distribute the books of Srila Prabhupada at least shortly and under the supervision of an expert SKT devotee. This will make the devotees experience the six brahminical activities being performed at once through the book distribution. Performing yajna (sankirtana yajna, yuga dharma), engaging others in yajna, studding shastra and teaching it, accepting donation and giving charity. This is the most auspicious and purifying activity, testing the main quality for the brahmana–vaishnava, namely surrender to Krishna and inspiring humbleness, tolerance, determination, faith etc. The books contain the fundamental knowledge on which the brahminical culture is based. These books are the basis of the brahminical culture.

- Every devotee in the Yatra to get the opportunity to serve in Krishna’s kitchen. Again the brahminical qualities are most suitable to perform this service.


- Every devotee in the Yatra to get the opportunity to visit and stay in Mayapur Dham. This will give the devotees opportunity to practically experience the brahminical culture in action, in very natural environment and the deity worship in its highest standard.

- Every devotee in the Yatra to get the opportunity to complete the Bhakti-shastri course, Temple worship course etc. This will teach and train the devotees about the brahminical culture.

- Every devotee to visit Goshala, serving the cows there and getting their blessings. We recommend donating and assisting goshalas anyhow by everybody.

Om tat sat

January 3, 2011

Srila Prabhupada on Vedic Culture




Prabhupada: ...this class, when it is held in Los Angeles, this full hall would have been compact. This is the difference between India and foreign countries. They are receiving this message of Krsna consciousness very seriously. Here they are rejecting. Indians, they're rejecting. There is a proverb: apanar dhana bilaye diye bhiksa mage parer dvare(?). They have lost their own culture, and they are now beggars. They are going to beg from door to door in the foreign countries. When I was speaking in Berkeley University sometimes in the year 1966, one Indian student stood up and he said, "Swamiji, what this Krsna consciousness movement will do? We require now technology." So I replied, "Yes. You are after technology. So you are a beggar. I am not a beggar. I have come here to give something. That is the difference. I have come here to give some culture, and you have come to imitate the Western civilization by technology. That is the difference. You'll remain a beggar, I shall remain a giver. That is the difference." So still I am maintaining that position of giving, not taking. Before me, so many swamijis went there. They did not give, but they took something and came here and advertised themselves as foreign-returned sannyasi and exploited the people. They lost even their original dress. Everyone knows, I have never changed my dress. Rather, I have given the dress to the foreigners, and they have taken it…So this is a culture. This culture is meant for the human society. Fortunately this culture developed on this land of Bharatavarsa. Unfortunately, people are so much bewildered that they are giving up this culture. That is the most regrettable portion of, of our movement. Anyway, my mission was that I shall go to America, and if some of the American boys and girls, younger section, would accept it, then I'll bring them here to show these rascals that how great this culture is.