February 18, 2010
ИСКОН София на второ място в света
Благодарение на усилията на българските бхакти нашия Храм е на второ място по разпространени книги в света в категорията на най-малките храмове.
Храмът класиран на първо място е от Индия, така че ние сме номер едно сред малките храмове в Западния свят.
Вечна слава на Сухотра Махараджа, които положи основите на санкиртана в България!
Вечна слава на Стхану Прабху и Падма Малини Матаджи!
Вечна слава на Парамджйоти Прабху, които подпомага санкиртана и на Пуруша Прабху, които използва годишната си отпуска за да разпространява книги!
Вечна слава на всички санкиртан бхакти и на всички, които ги окуражават и им помагат!
Догодина първи!
February 14, 2010
Сат санга и асат санга
от Тулси дас
Критерий за нашия напредък в Кришна съзнание е колко силна е вярата ни в Кришна. До каква степен сме поверили живота си в ръцете на Кришна и до каква степен разчитаме на себе си. В Чайтаня Чаритамрита е дадено следното определение за вяра:
„Преданият трябва да бъде твърдо убеден, че Кришна ще го защити. Никой друг всъщност не може да ни защити и тази твърда убеденост се нарича вяра.” (ЧЧ, Мадхя, 22.100)
За да може нашата вяра да укрепне ние имаме нужда от благоприятна заобикаляща ни среда. За да може едно дете да се развие правилно то има нужда от благоприятната среда на грижовните родители; за един предан тази среда е обкръжението на преданите (сат санга). Шастра заявява:
„Човек може да постигне съвършенството на живота ако е общувал с чисти предани дори само за миг. Това твърдят всички разкрити писания.” (ЧЧ, Мадхя, 22.54)
„Да се дискутират забавленията на Бога в компанията на чисти предани е много удовлетворяващо за слуха и сърцето. Чрез култивиране на такова знание човек постепенно напредва по пътя към освобождението и след като го постигне неговия вкус става установен. Тогава започва истинското предано служене.” (ШБ, 3.25.25)
В такова обкръжение нашия духовен напредък е сигурен. Ние започваме да ставаме все по-сериозни в духовния живот и да отдаваме регулярно предано служене (бхаджана крия). Ценностната ни система започва да се променя и постепенно изоставяме лошите си навици (анартха ниврити).Тогава, необезпокоявани от нашите недостатаци, ние ставаме напълно погълнати от дейностите на преданото служене (ништа) и все по-силно започваме да усещаме вкуса на Кришна съзнание (ручи,асакти). По този начин в обкръжението на преданите вярата ни става все по-твърда. Все повече започваме да действаме на нивото „аз съм слуга на Кришна” (Кришнера нитиа даса).
От друга страна в обкръжението на непредани (асат санга) вярата ни пак се усилва, но не вярата ни в Кришна (ека шарана), а вярата в материалистичния начин на живот. Захващаме се да отдаваме регулярно служене на сетивата си, семейството, нацията или целия човешки род (бхаджана крия). Ценностната ни система и различните ни схващания и концепции за живота все повече се повлияват от това. Започваме да виждаме светският начин на живот като не чак толкова лош. Започваме да развиваме различни лоши навици и постепенно унищожаваме добрите си качества развити по милостта на преданото служене (артха ниврити или анартха праврири). Все повече сме погълнати от светски дейности и ставаме напълно установени в концепцията за живота ахам мамети, „аз съм това тяло и всичко свързано с него е мое” (ништа). Тогава човек започва да се „наслаждава” на материалните си притежания, ставайки все по-привързан към тях (ручи, асакти). В такова общуване вярата ни, че целта на живота е удовлетворението на сетивата (кармендрия прити), става все по-силна. Започваме да търсим убежище и сигурност все повече и повече в материята, в банковата си сметка, в членовете на семейството (ненадеждните войни, в работата си, в илюзорната протекция на правителството, в лъжите на политиците и т.н.
По този начин много предани постепенно губят вярата си в Кришна като техен единствен подслон, вярата в преданното служене и вярата във ведическата култура като алтернатива на днешната западна „култура”. А дори кармите знаят, че когато загуби вярата си човек губи всичко. Тази тежка загуба се дължи главно на неблагоприятното общуване (асат санга).
Някои може да възрази, „какъв е проблемът, положението не е толкова лошо колкото го описвате”.
Проблемът е, че днес може да имаме материални притежания, заради които да се чувстваме сигурни - достатъчно пари, хубава жена, голяма къща, скъпа кола, но колко време те ще бъдат наши? В края на живота ще бъдем принудени да изоставим всичко това. Накрая ще бъдем принудени да изоставим илюзията, че аз съм това тяло и че материалните аранжименти могат да ми дадат сигурност. Ако приживе не се разделим доброволно с нашите упадхи (обозначения), накрая те ще бъдат насилствено ампутирани. Amputated upadhis. В края на живота единственият ни подслон ще бъде Кришна.
Затова общуването с преданите е толкова важно – защото то ни освобождава от фалшивите ни концепции за живота.
Общуването с преданите не значи да ги използваме като аплодираща нашите шоу- изпълнения тълпа почитатели. Общуване с преданите не значи да ги експлоатираме материално и емоционално само защото сме се присъединили към движението малко по-рано от тях. Общуване с преданите не значи приятна компания за малко „невинна” праджалпа.
Общуване с преданите значи да им служим безкористно и да се молим да развием техните възвишени качества, заради които те са толкова скъпи на Кришна.
Шрила Прабхупада пише в коментара си към Шримад Бхагаватам 1.5.19:
„Заради лошо общуване понякога преданият започва да имитира кармите. Кармите искат да контролират материалния свят. По подобен начин начинаещият предан глупаво планира да натрупа материални богатства в замяна на преданото си служене. Такива глупави предани понякога са поставяни в трудна ситуация лично от самия Бог. Като специална милост, Той може да им отнеме всички материални притежания. По този начин заблуденият предан бива изоставен от всичките си роднини и приятели и по милостта на Бога се връща към преданото служене.
В Бхагавад-гита се казва, че такива паднали предани получават възможност да се родят в семейства на издигнати брахмани или в семейства на богати търговци. Но такъв предан не е толкова щастлив както този, който е поставен от Кришна в на пръв поглед безпомощна ситуация. Падналият предан, който е роден в добро семейство може да забрави лотосовите нозе на Бога, защото не е толкова щастлив, но преданият, който е поставен в окаяно положение се връща бързо в подслона на лотосовите нозе на Бога, защото се мисли за напълно безпомощен.”
Kirtan Reform Workshop by Jayadvaita Swami, part 3
Morning tune
Srila Prabhupada was very strict in the melody sung during the man- gala-aratika. He wanted the morning melody and nothing else. He would sometimes stop kirtans if other melodies were sung in the morning. Of course he was not always doing that, but when he was nearby and there was someone to appreciate the point, he would correct the mistake.
--Harikesa Swami
We were chanting mangal aratika within the room of Srila Prabhupada each morning. Sometimes Prabhupada would appreciate the singing and sometimes not. Later on in the morning after a particularly bad kirtan, Prabhupada called me into his room and complained about the singing. He said, again, more or less, << I did not like the singing in the morning. The morning melody must be sung throughout the mangala aratika and no other melody should be sung. It should be sung sweetly and melodiously, like this ... [and he proceeded to sing the first verse of the samsara prayer in a very sweet and melodious voice with perfect inflection and musical accent]. >> Prabhupada was very insistent that the singing should be done in that way only. He indicated that he wanted me to lead the kirtans in the morning as a way to establish the standards within the temple. –Harikesa Swami
We have Srila Prabhupada’s recorded instruction: “This is the morning tune.”
If you ask me, “double-timing” the melody takes all the charm out of it. (I mean speeding it up and taking all the stops and rests out of it, making it sound something like a march.)
By the way: The morning tune is not to be sung in the evening.
Jaya Radhe
The next morning I led the kirtan in his room duplicating the melodious style which he had shown me the day before [for the morning tune]. Prabhupada was pleased and seemed to enjoy the kirtan. Unfortunately I fell victim to that demon within the mind and started to speculate a couple of “Jaya radhe’s” at the end of the kirtan. This was one of the bigger mistakes made by me at that time. Although there is nothing wrong with “Jaya radhe”, Prabhupada simply didn’t want us to chant it. He once explained that Sukadeva Gosvami did not feel himself qualified to chant the name of Radha in the Srimad-bhagavatam and therefore only indicated her name with the word “aradhana” while describing the topmost gopi friend of Krsna.
Anyway, to continue the story, I had just started to chant Srimati Radharani’s holy name within Vrindavan dham, Her beloved Lord’s abode, within the presence of Her most intimate devotee, during the most auspicious hours of the day, when Her most intimate devotee looked at me with eyes blazing like fire and desirous of initiating my immediate destruction. Voice choked and gagging, I ended the kirtan immediately without further formalities, never again to make the same mistake. Prabhupada never ended kirtans with various extra mantras, especially not “Jaya radhe”, so why should I? –Harikesa Swami
Srila Prabhupada didn’t chant it. And his response when people on his morning walk in Vrindaban greeted him with “Jaya Radhe”?
“Hare Krsna.”
Some particulars of ISKCON liturgy
The “Deity ditties”
Have now become obligatory at the end of every kirtana.
They even sometimes appear in the middle of mangala-arati, after Gurvastakam.
And sometimes after Nrsimha arati or tulasi puja or “jaya radha-madhava” in Bhagavatam class.
Srila Prabhupada didn’t chant them.
And they sometimes lead to “Jaya Radhe, jaya radhe!”
Mantras heard:
DEITY DITTIES
Jaya Radha-Something, Radha-Something Radhe
This was NOT chanted by Srila Prabhupada
“Radha-Radha-Something Something” (Krpamoya MP3)
Where can this lead?
Heard in Bahrain:
Jaya Radha Radha-Krsna, Radha Radha-Krsna, Radhe!
Reported in RSA:
Jaya Radha-Jagannatha, Radha-Jagannatha, Radhe!
RSA:
Jaya Nitai Gaura Hari, Nitai Gaura Hari, Gaura Hari
or
Jaya Nitai Saci-suta, Nitai Saci-suta, Saci-suta
(derivation? It fits the same meter as “Jaya Radha-X, Radha-X, Radhe”)
Mayapur:
Jaya Panca-tattva, Jaya Panca-tattva
(not “Sri krsna caitanya prabhu nityananda, etc.)
Here and there:
Jaya salagrama-sila, Jaya salagrama-sila
Here and there:
Jaya Jagannatha, Jaya Baladeva, Jaya Subhadra, Jaya Jagannatha!
(then start playing with variations on the order)
Haraye namah krsna yädaväya namah
Another common practice is to end kirtana with this mantra:
haraye namah krsna yadavaya namah
yadavaya madhava kesavaya namah
gopala govinda rama sri-madhusudana
giridhari gopinatha madana-mohana
Sometimes this is also followed by the next verse, offering obeisances to the six Gosvamis.
This comes from a bona fide song by Srila Narottama Dasa Thakura. But why have these verses become customary to chant at the end of kirtana? I speculate that it's because devotees have heard that Srila Prabhupada asked us to. So I bring to your attention Srila Prabhupada's actual request:
"We are already accustomed to chant these two mantras--sri-krsna-caitanya prabhu nityananda sri-advaita gadadhara srivasadi-gaura-bhakta-vrnda and Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare/Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare. Now, after these, the other two lines--namely, haraye namah, krsna yadavaya namah/ gopala govinda rama sri-madhusudana--should be added, especially in Mayapur. Chanting of these six lines should go on so perfectly well that no one there hears any other vibration than the chanting of the holy names of the Lord. That will make the center spiritually all perfect." (Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi 17.124, purport)
As mentioned twice in Caitanya-caritamrta, Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu personally chanted these two lines. (Two lines, not four.) The song by Narottama Dasa Thakura, bona fide though it be, is not what Srila Prabhupada asked us to chant at the end of kirtana.
Gurvastakam—
Why chant “Jaya Prabhupada” in the middle?
Is this “the Prabhupada song”?
Nrsimha kirtana
Why “Jaya Bhakta Prahlada”?
Do you ever hear about “Bhakta Haridasa Thakura” or “Bhakta Rupa Gosvami”? Then why “Bhakta Prahlada”?
Because in modern ISKCON you always have to end the kirtana with “Jaya Somebody or other,” and we picked up “Bhakta Prahlad” from the Indian movie of the same name, and it fits the beat, that’s why.
But how about this: “When a devotee is great he is called prabhu, and when he is lesser he is called bhakta, or a devotee.” (Cc. Adi 6.99, purport)
Tulasi-arati
In the tulasi pranama, it’s devyai, not devi
Nivedana, not nivedena
Why “Jaya tulasi-devi! Jaya bhakti devi!”?
Free-form prema-dhvani
Jaya everything, without regard for sense or order.
And this is another place to recite all the Deity names (as if they weren’t already included in the beginning)
Srila Prabhupada never did this.
Why “A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Srila Prabhupada”?
And when you’ve done “Om visnupada” etc., you don’t need “His Divine Grace.” (You’ve said all that and more.)
Bengali melodies
Any tune can be used. When it is in relationship with Krishna, that makes it bona fide; --letter to Ekayani, 31 Aug 71
Regarding the presentation of "Govindam'' as well as other mantras, the vibration is always pure. I will give the theme and if the sound is Westernized that does not matter. But another point is that this specific sound of Kirtana as I sing is also another introduction of art that can be intermingled with Western art, and such combination will certainly be appreciated. But so far I know that the Kirtana tune is a specific representation of Gaudiya Vaisnavas and this tune is appreciated all over India as unique. They say that the Kirtana tune is the specific gift of Bengal, and that is a fact. So why not utilize this tune in the Western countries under the able guidance of such expert musician as George? --letter to Syamasundara, 25 Feb 1970
Clanging and banging
Of note to you perhaps is an instruction that Srila Prabhupad gave many many many times, mostly to leaders, but on occasion to groups of devotees. He withheld this instruction from general assemblies, my understanding being that he did not want to discourage devotees from chanting, even when the chanting was not properly done. This instruction I have noted is one of Srila Prabhupada’s pet peeves, one of the things that annoyed him the most of all the ways that kirtan was being "done".
We had a kirtan at the Ram lila grounds, 1976 March and Dinanath was leading, and tens of thousands were attending and chanting. After the program Srila Prabhupad and I were alone in the back tent waiting for his servant and the car. As you know he would often ask rhetorical questions, and he asked me "So, what did you think of the kirtan?" Understanding this was just a lead in to his giving me an instruction I answered with a bland "it was OK".
Srila Prabhupada’s definition to me then was as follows:
"No it was not nice, it was clanging and banging. Kirtan should be sweet and melodious [my note ref from Gaura Arati] Come let us go to the ashram and have kirtan"
And so we went, Srila Prabhupad, his servant, Baradraj, and myself. Except his servant, the three of us sat in his room and Baradraj played harmonium on the request of Srila Prabhupad, and we had a long kirtan, of course exactly the opposite of your ten commandmants. On S.P's signal the kirtan ended. He looked at me, smiling, a little shaking his head, and said
"So...sweet and melodious" And then he moved on with the rest of preaching and hearing.
I had heard him say and heard that he also said, sometimes stopping kirtan, and saying "No screaming and shouting"
So kirtan is not, clanging and banging, screaming and shouting. Kirtan is sweet and melodious.
The beautiful song to glorify the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If a small ray of the beauty of that song would enter the heart then one would be so over flooded with love of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Sri Krishna, that one could only sing his holy names, and the name of his divine consort, with sweetness and melodiousness,
--Tejiyas Dasa, 12 Nov 02
Don’t divert attention to more instruments
Regarding your question about kirtana, practically we are not concerned with the instruments. They are used sometimes to make it sweeter, but if we divert our attention for using the instruments more, that is not good. Generally kirtana is performed with mrdanga and karatalas, but if somebody is expert instrument player, he can be admitted to join Sankirtana. We can accept everything for Krishna's service, but not taking the risk of diverting attention to any other thing which will hinder our Krishna Consciousness. That should be our motto, or principle. –letter to Jadurani, 26 May 69
Regarding instruments for temple kirtanas, karatala and mrdanga are sufficient. There is no need of other instruments. –letter to Rupanuga, 2 Feb 75
The harmonium may be played during bhajan if there is someone who can play melodiously. But it is not for kirtana and arati. –letter to Bahudak, 11 Jan 76
But: Regarding the instruments, stringed instruments are Vedic, but the real Vedic instrument is mrdanga and karatala. Anyway, you have to do according to the time and circumstances if you use these other instruments. So you have got my approval and you can go on. –letter to Bahudak, 10 November 75
Prabhupada: The other musical instrument, if he plays his attention will be diverted in musical instrument, not to chanting. "We have to see melody, whether it is going on nicely." But that is not good. Our concentration should be hearing Hare Krsna. That is... That is bhakti. Caitanya Mahaprabhu, simply this karatala, khola, that's all. In those days... Of course, there was no harmonium, but many stringed instruments were there. Sitar, esaraja, but these things were not used. Sometimes we do use to attract, but it is not required. -- Room Conversation, December 26, 1976, Bombay
We are not professional musicians
As I have already written to you, we should not try to become a very popular musical party. Music is one of our items for chanting, but we are not musicians. We should always remember this fact. The best example is that we take advantage of the typewriting machine, but that does not mean we are professional typists. –letter to Mukunda, 2 July 69
I am pleased to note that there is interest in having our Sankirtana Party perform in various public engagements. The same thing is going on here, and they have been invited to such places as Amsterdam and Germany. So if you can also do this, it is nice. But do not change our principles. Practicing is already done by kirtana. It is not required for us to become artists. Our main point is service to Krishna, not to please an audience. We shall not divert our attention too much to adjustment of musical sounds. People should not misunderstood that we are a band of musical artists. They must know that we are devotees of Krishna. Our devotional practice and purity shall be so strong that wherever we chant there will be immediately an impression in the audience for devotion to Krishna. –letter to Tamal Krsna, 30 Oct 69
But one thing we must remember that we are not professional musicians or concert party. Our main business is to vibrate the Holy Name of Krishna everywhere so that the people will be benefited by hearing the transcendental sound. The musical training is not so important as it is to keep ourselves spiritually fit in spiritual strength, that we should not forget. If we are in spiritual strength, there will be no scarcity of money; and the spiritual strength is that each and every one of us must chant the sixteen rounds of beads and follow the rules and regulations with great adherence. –letter to Tamal Krishna, 8 Feb 70
So if you have talent for musical achievement, that is nice; but if you nourish some idea of becoming famous by playing some music, that will be a source of frustration—the end. So it is better if you play your music for Krishna by having very ecstatic kirtanas in your center in Vancouver, and in this way, as I have introduced it, all of the devotees and also the general public as well will be able to join together cooperatively in the glorification of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, not that we shall glorify anyone else. Let the materialists operate in their own way, but we have got Vaisnavism stand and we should train the general public to accept it and come up to our platform of process of doing things, not that we should reduce to their standard.'' –letter to Mahatma, 10 April 72
My opinion is that it is not necessary for us to utilize these different musical talents for spreading Krsna Consciousness. I would rather see people follow strictly the path of Lord Caitanya and His Sankirtana devotees. We are using mrdanga, karatala, that is enough. We are not musicians. We are Krsna bhaktas. Therefore we do not stress so much importance on these different musical talents. Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu is God Himself. Had He thought it would have been better to spread Krsna Consciousness by another way He would have done so. But no, simply with mrdanga and karatala, traveling and chanting Hare Krsna, asking everyone to chant Hare Krsna, preaching simply Srimad-Bhagavatam philosophy, this is the process. There is no need for us to try and add anything to this simple method. It will only be a distraction. Therefore I request you to follow the simple path of Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu and help me spread this wonderful mission all over the world. Keep yourself pure and fixed up in Krsna Consciousness by following the basic principles that I have given; chanting 16 rounds daily, following the four regulative principles, rising early, attending mangala arati and classes etc. This is of the utmost importance. –letter to Jagadisa Pandit, 28 Dec 74
I understand also, there was a Kirtana performance given by Sri Purna das. You have rightly remarked whether they are devotees. You are right. These people are professional singers. Krishna Kirtana is not for earning a livelihood. Krishna Kirtana is not meant for entertaining the public for demonstration of arts. It is dynamic service to the Lord. We do not therefore mind so much about the artistic presentation of Krishna Kirtana but we want to see how much a devotee is satisfying the Supreme Will. --Letter to Jadurani, 12 December, 1967
The “Sankirtana Competition” in Mayapur 1977. (“They are simply chanting for money.”)
During Srila Prabhupada’s last days in Vrindaban, Bhavananda Maharaja brought a group of Bengali devotees from ISKCON Mayapur who were expert kirtana men. They all came by train. But when they arrived, Srila Prabhupada showed no interest in them. He heard their kirtana once or not at all, and so they occupied themselves in chanting for the Deities while Srila Prabhupada listened to his preferred kirtaniyas, close devotees such as Bharadraja Prabhu, Hamsaduta Swami, and Yasodanandana Swami and Guru-krpa Swami.
Regarding a brahmana singer from Santipura, Kalidasa Lahiri: “Early in life, while still a young boy, experts in the field of Indian classical music had taught him, and he considered that such instruction qualified him to occasionally lead the kirtana sessions of the Vaisnavas. However, when previously, he had led some kirtanas, the Vaisnavas were apparently not fond of his typically palace-court classical touch. Nonetheless, he had introduced these classical variations into the kirtanas, oblivious of the Vaisnavas' feelings. Attempting to parade his musical ability, he had stared at the faces of the Vaisnavas, awaiting a response, hoping for some appreciation. For quite some days now, this had continued. However, quite suddenly, a few days earlier, he had unexpectedly started to feel increasing pleasure in singing harinama.” –Jaiva Dharma, Chapter 3
“He [Kalidasa Lahiri Mahasaya] lost all interest in trivial talks, as well as classical music. Thus, a metamorphosis took place in Lahiri Mahasaya. He was now a Vaisnava.” –Jaiva Dharma, Chapter 4
Krpamoya Dasa (153935): When I lead kirtana, I feel I want to serve the devotees that are there. I'm very conscious that there's a very thin line and you can fall either side of the line. If you can sing in such a way that afterwards devotees come up and say "Nice kirtana," you've got to be very careful that you don't allow your artistic considerations to take precedence over the devotional. My devotional considerations are to be thinking of two things--Krsna and allowing the devotees to have space in which to listen to the holy name and reflect. So I try to chant in such a way that I know that everybody can join in. I don't tend to sing unfamiliar tunes. I sing familiar tunes that I think the devotees will know, just so they can become absorbed. I don't change the tunes that often. And I just really try to stay this side of the line of modulating the voice too much--that is, not modulating the voice so much that people will treat it as an artistic thing and not a devotional thing.
Mention B.R. Sridhara Maharaja’s having been chosen to lead kirtana at the passing of Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura—sincerity over art.
Style is not the thing
With regard to your question about Bengali style kirtana and mrdanga playing, one or two styles is best. To introduce more styles is not good. It will become an encumbrance. If we introduce so much emphasis on style of kirtana, then simply imitation will go on. Devotional emotion is the main thing. If we give stress to instrument and style then attention will be diverted to the style. That will be spiritual loss.
----Letter to Satsvarupa Goswami, 30 June, 1976
At one of the ISKCON international festivals in Vrndavana, Srila Prabhupada rejected the singing of one of his disciples. The devotee had previously been a singer in a band, and his kirtanas were much appreciated by some devotees, especially those from his home temple. But when, with showy professionalism, he began leading the guru-puja in Prabhupada's presence, making the tune sound like a rock and roll ballad, Prabhupada didn't like it. He shook his head and indicated that someone else lead. The "great" kirtana singer was devastated by the rejection, another form of Prabhupada's mercy. --Prabhupada Nectar
It is to be understood that when Çré Caitanya Mahäprabhu chanted and danced, He did so by the influence of the pleasure potency of the spiritual world. Çré Caitanya Mahäprabhu never considered the holy name of the Lord to be a material vibration, nor does any pure devotee mistake the chanting of the Hare Kåñëa mantra to be a material musical manifestation. Lord Caitanya never tried to be the master of the holy name; rather He taught us how to be servants of the holy name. If one chants the holy name of the Lord just to make a show, not knowing the secret of success, he may increase his bile secretion, but he will never attain perfection in chanting the holy name. –Cc. Adi 7.95-96
Pace
Start slow, build up
In Indian classical music also, they begin slow (with the alap), then speed up.
In this way, one becomes absorbed in the sound
The mach-two startup
The two-speed metronome
Stick with a tune
Govinda Maharaja: “You just dig a groove and let them fall into it.”
Madhava Dasa, 2001.10.27p NVD (66 minutes)
Chant tunes people can follow
Easy, familiar tunes
Sing in a comfortable pitch
That is, a pitch comfortable for others—one they can join in on.
Do we need to “max out” the amplifiers?
For more than a month, Prabhupada has had to ask daily that devotees not use the microphone for performing kirtana: "They think that their voice becomes sweet from using it. Actually, they sound exactly like a raksasa." –TKG’s Diary, pg 149
See “Noise-induced hearing loss” at www.krishna.com/jas
“As a society, we are becoming addicted to microphones, even when not even necessary. Be sensitive to those who do not prefer them (never shove a microphone in someone’s face, especially if they indicate that they would prefer otherwise).”
The mrdanga players should chant Hare Krsna
The mrdanga players should follow the leader
Prabhupada was present during a kirtana performed by his disciples in the Brooklyn temple. The mrdanga player had been practicing to learn complicated beats, and he was demonstrating his rapid and intricate abilities in the kirtana. But Prabhupada stopped the music and said to the drummer that he should follow the leader. Then he started the kirtana again, but it happened again and again Prabhupada stopped the kirtana and asked the drummer to follow the leader. –Prabhupada Nectar 1.22
Karatalas
Learn how to play them
Krpamoya Prabhu: “They’re musical instruments, not just percussion instruments.”
Govinda Maharaja trains his disciples to play them softly.
They sound sweet.
They don’t drown out the lead singer.
And if someone’s off the beat, at least they’ll be soft (and therefore less conspicuous).
Dancing
April 26, 1973, ISKCON Los Angeles
It was here that Brahmananda Maharaja and I introduced the Bengali style of dancing to the western devotees. We had learned it at the Mayapura festival. Many of the devotees loved it and Srila Prabhupada was seen smiling as he watched the devotees dance before him. But, some did not agree. Pradyumna asked Srila Prabhupada if it was all right to dance in that way because some of the devotees thought it strange. "Yes, of course!" Srila Prabhupada replied. Srila Prabhupada loved to see his disciples chant "Hare Krsna" and dance in ecstasy. Jai Srila Prabhupada!
--Srutakirti Dasa
February 13, 2010
Kirtan Reform Workshop by Jayadvaita Swami, part 2
Examples of current ISKCON mantras
They’re “Catchy jingles introduced into ISKCON kirtana.” (B.V. Swami)
Govinda bolo hari, gopala bolo
Radharani ki jaya, maharani ki jaya
A Brijbasi folk song, says B.V. Swami
Jaya Radha-ramana haribol
(an invented pop bhajan)
Radhe-radhe syama milade (“O Radharani, please introduce me to your Syama.”)
Along with it, one verse is something else also heard lately: “Radhe radhe radhe, sri krsna radhe radhe”
In “More Songs of the Vaisnava Acaryas,” the song is labeled “Traditional Gujarati chant.” (Which acarya?)
Sampradaya vihina ye mantras te nisphala matah. (Padma Purana)
Don’t concoct mantras
September 6, 1976, Vrindavana Conversation in Garden [excerpt from Transcendental Diary Vol. 4 -- see also recording of conversation in Folio]
"Svayambhur wanted more clarification on what Srila Prabhupada had said about the chanting of nitai-gaura being a deviation. In his mind there was some contradiction, and he put it to Prabhupada to resolve. "Prabhupada, you wrote in the Caitanya-caritamrta that the Caitanya maha-mantra, sri-krsna-caitanya prabhu nityananda. ... there is no offence to that. And so therefore in the Kali-yuga it is actually more beneficial ..."
Prabhupada repeated his comments made to Harikesa Maharaja. "Offence is that what is spoken by the acaryas, if you do not follow, that is offence. Guror avajna. To chant Gaura-Nitai is no offence. But if our previous gurus have chanted sri-krsna-caitanya prabhu nityananda sri-advaita-why should we go beyond that? That is guror avajna. Even there is no aparadha, because guru, Kaviraja Gosvami, has sung like that and my guru has sung, we should follow that. We should not make any deviation. That is guror avajna, sruti-sastra-nindanam; namno balad yasya hi papa-buddhih. So it comes to be one of the items of the dasa-vidha-aparadha [ten offences in chanting]. Guror avajna.
"Is it more beneficial for people to hear the Panca-tattva mantra than the Hare Krsna maha-mantra?" Svayambhur asked.
"Oh yes," Prabhupada told us. "You are going to Hare Krsna through Nitai-Gaura. Nitaiyer karuna habe braje radha-krsna pabe." But he added, "The principle is don't try to manufacture. Because you are not experienced, so what nonsense you will manufacture, that will be offensive. Better go on, the simple thing."
No new mantras
For worshipping the Deities in Bombay, including Sita-Rama, there is absolutely no change in worship. Adopt the same method as in our Vrindaban centre, simply with 3 pujaris just like in Vrindaban. They are all Visnu-tattva, Ramacandra, Radha-Krsna, Gaura-Nitai. No additional kirtanas, simply do exactly as in Vrindaban. --letter to Saurabha, 76-06-07
(“Jaya Sita-Rama Laksman Hanuman. . .” Ooops!)
Bhakti Vikasa Swami writes: “In ISKCON Bombay, where the Deities of Sita-Rama-Laksman-Hanuman are installed, Srila Prabhupada instructed not to chant, “Jaya Sita-Rama-Laksman-Hanuman.” He said that Their names are included in the maha-mantra and that further chanting was therefore unnecessary.” (He mentions that he was told this by Bhima Prabhu.)
Jaya Gurudeva!
He objected to the usage of 'Jaya Gurudeva' since it was a direct insertion into our movement from the sahajiya sampradayas in Bengal who always say things like 'Jaya Guru', 'Jaya Gurudeva', without referring to any particular guru. Prabhupada criticised this as impersonal and did not want it chanted by his disciples. 'Who is the guru?', he would challenge. –Harikesa Swami
Story from Krpamoya Prabhu (on MP3 file)
Hare Krsna: No “Bhaja”
One devotee was leading the guru puja kirtan in a very ecstatic way. Then all of a sudden this devotee started to sing “bhaja Hare Krsna Hare Krsna Krsna Krsna Hare Hare...” and Prabhupada became very, very angry and stopped the kirtan. Everyone was so ecstatic that they were jumping three to four feet high, but then Prabhupada just shouted “Stop that!” and the kirtana immediately stopped. Prabhupada asked him “Where did you learn this bhaja Hare Krsna? Did you ever hear me singing bhaja Hare Krsna?” And Prabhupada just chastised him for about five minutes. He was very heavy. He told him “Never add anything to Hare Krsna maha mantra and never subtract anything from Hare Krsna maha mantra. Sing the maha mantra just as it is”. Prabhupada also explained that “This is how deviation starts. Somebody puts in his own concocted thing and then somebody else comes, he adds some more concoction to it and with time it becomes a complete distortion”. --Bhakti Caru Swami
Harikesa Swami tells of a similar incident in France in July of 1976.
Bhakti Vikasa Swami writes: “Srila Prabhupada did not want anything chanted before the Hare Krsna maha mantra. Once he stopped Jaya Pataka Maharaja from chanting “bolo” before the Hare Krsna maha mantra. Bolo simply means “chant” but Srila Prabhupada did not like it and therefore we should not add it, or anything else, to the maha mantra.”
How other mantras got started
An understanding of how other mantras and techniques came into the movement is helpful in relieving the doubts that might arise in the minds of those who were not informed of what Srila Prabhupada expected in kirtan. Some devotees had to leave America due to various legal reasons and had no place to stay but in some Gaudiya Math temples. In some of these temples they chant all different kinds of mantras without restriction. Although these mantras are not unbonafide and are seemingly proper, Srila Prabhupada did not want us to use them in our temple kirtans. However this form of kirtan filtered into our movement very quickly since it was new and exciting and therefore rapidly accepted by the kirtan leaders to increase the enthusiasm of the devotees. After all, variety is the spice of life. This variety however, did not actually please Srila Prabhupada.
Although the Vrindavana temple was opened in March of 1975, Srila Prabhupada had started establishing the standards of its functioning in the previous year. He was concentrating his energies on creating the proper Deity, kitchen, and economic standards. At this time Srila Prabhupada asked me to be the president of the temple. He was personally instructing me in various aspects of the management. Since we are writing about Srila Prabhupada's standards for kirtan, I would like to recount his specific instructions in regards to the standards for kirtan which he wanted me to rigidly enforce.
--Harikesa Swami (article in the now defunct Vaisnava Journal, 1988)
Standards in Vrindavana
As far as standards go, his instructions could not have been more specific. The exact cause of these instructions was a kirtan in the temple led by Bharadvaja das, the night before. Srila Prabhupada had been in the habit of attending our nightly kirtans and classes due to his being sickly and unable to speak. That evening Bharadvaj chose to sing a song (which he said he got from a book by Gopal Bhatta Goswami) which was a variation on the mantra Krsna Krsna Krsna Krsna Krsna Krsna Krsna He, but instead of it being for Krsna, Krsna was replaced with Gaura, so that the mantra went, Gaura Gaura Gaura Gaura Gaura Gaura Gaura He &etc. Srila Prabhupada disliked this extremely, so much so that the next morning he called me into his room and wanted from me an explanation of why Bharadvaja was chanting like that. I could not give a proper explanation at that moment, but Prabhupada said that he never wanted to hear that again in the temple and that I should never allow such kinds of 'speculation' in kirtan. He then went on to specifically describe how kirtan should be done.
More or less his exact words were, << Now I want to establish the standards for kirtan. You may chant as follows; for mangala aratika, the samsara-dava prayer, then sri krsna caitanya, then hare krsna, nothing else. For the guru-puja, the 'guru-prayer' [that's what he called it], sri krsna caitanya, hare krsna, nothing else. For evening aratika, the gaura aratika song, sri krsna caitanya, and hare krsna, nothing else. For all aratikas this basic pattern should be followed. The chanting of Sri Krsna Caitanya mantra should only be for three times, not more. No one should sing a bhajan unless all the devotees know what the song means. No one should sing songs in Vrindavan temple that are in languages which the people do not understand. Yasomati-nandana may be sung since the people understand that. >> I did not put this section in quotes since it would be highly presumptuous of me to think that I can remember Prabhupada's exact words after 13 years have passed, but it is close enough for us to learn from.
--Harikesa Swami
Hari bol, Hari bol
March 18, 1973, ISKCON Mayapur Candrodaya Mandir:
During ISKCON's first international festival in Mayapur, many devotees demonstrated how they had become influenced by the Bengali form of kirtan. Srila Prabhupada expressed some displeasure about the chanting of so many different mantras. "They can chant their 'Nitai Gaura, Hari Bols'," he said, "but I will chant Hare Krsna and go back home, back to Godhead."
Perhaps if we had understood the translation of "Hari bol," then we would have known what to do. Srila Prabhupada enjoyed chanting the Maha-mantra.
–Sruta Kirti Prabhu
Bhakti Vikasa Swami: On another occasion, during Mayapura festival of 1976, devotees were chanting “Haribol, Haribol, Haribol, Haribol!” again and again in a huge, exuberant kirtana. After several minutes of this Srila Prabhupada sent word down from his room to chant the Hare Krsna mantra. Srila Prabhupada said that we are not the Haribol sampradaya. (In Bengal there is a group of deviant Vaisnavas known as the Haribol sampradaya who wildly chant Haribol! Haribol! over and over for hours on end.)
Bhakti Vikasa Swami: “Another time, devotees asked Srila Prabhupada about the kirtana that Lokanatha Maharaja’s party often performed, singing haribol for five or ten minutes back and forth.
“Prabhupada, although not too upset by the kirtana, made it clear that such chanting was not approved by him. He told us that we should mainly chant the Hare Krsna maha-mantra. He said ‘nitai-gaura haribol’ is all right, because they are bona fide names of the Lord, but the real point is that we should strictly follow only what the acaryas have given. This is the process. He said that the acaryas only chant all five names of the Panca-tattva, not just two. So although there is no offense in chanting the names of Gaura-Nitai, if we deviate and chant our own made-up mantras then this is guror avajna, or disobeying the orders of the spiritual master, and the line of the acaryas. To make advancement in spiritual life one must always follow the line of acaryas.” (Transcendental Diary 4, p. 361)
Gaura Nityananda Bol
After singing the standard prayers and the maha-mantra, Lokanatha Maharaja began chanting “gaura-nityananda bol, haribol, haribol; gaura-sriadvaita bol, haribol, haribol; gaura-sri gadadhara bol, haribol, haribol...” with a lot of emphasis on the response of haribol, haribol. Srila Prabhupada suddenly signaled him from the stage to stop it; he apparently didn’t like it, although he didn’t say why. (Transcendental Diary 4, p. 282)
One morning in the winter of 1975, after the temple was opened, Ananda prabhu was leading kirtana. Ananda prabhu was a Godbrother of Srila Prabhupada who had been living in our temple for many years, humbly engaged in serving the devotees with great love and devotion. He was the personal cook of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati and was extremely expert in preparing foods from simple indigenous leaves, roots and fruits, as well as preparing emergency medicinal herbs when the need arose (as when a scorpion stung Saurabh Das and was saved by Ananda Prabhu's timely herb application). He was also an enthusiastic kirtana leader.
Srila Prabhupada was in his room as usual during the mangala aratika kirtan and I was in the room next to his waiting some order or command. I was not to be disappointed. The kirtana was loud and the speakers, combined with the reverberation of the hall, projected the sound into Prabhupada's room with great ease. Prabhupada called me into his room. I already knew what was going to happen since I was trained by him the previous year and knew his standards for kirtana. Ananda prabhu was chanting Gaura Nityananda bol etc. I knew that this was not what should happen, but I was Prabhupada's servant at this time and not the president any longer.
Much to my surprise he said, “Go to the temple room and stop him from singing the kirtana. Tell him that this is your temple and that you will lead the kirtanas the way you want.” Well, this was quite a shock. It was the first time that I ever had to stop one of his own Godbrothers from singing a kirtana, but I dutifully marched off to the temple room to fulfill the order. I was not at all feeling good about this as I was afraid of making some offense or being crass or crude about it. Being fallen I just couldn't bring myself to say it exactly as Prabhupada had said it, but I managed to mutter out some words to the effect that Prabhupada didn't want this mantra in the temple and that would he please chant Hare Krsna instead? This made a little \scene with the devotees not understanding what was going on, so I managed to explain something to some others since the kirtana was still going on without interruption, but soon the kirtana was stopped and taken over by others.
Prabhupada was never abrasive towards others and especially I had never seen him act like this in the temple, but he was so determined that the kirtana standard be maintained and not changed by the introduction of 'other' mantras which were commonly heard in other temples and maths, that he sent me to stop his own godbrother from singing in the temple. This incident impressed me greatly as to his determination in this regard.
–Harikesa Swami
Morning tune
Srila Prabhupada was very strict in the melody sung during the man- gala-aratika. He wanted the morning melody and nothing else. He would sometimes stop kirtans if other melodies were sung in the morning. Of course he was not always doing that, but when he was nearby and there was someone to appreciate the point, he would correct the mistake.
--Harikesa Swami
We were chanting mangal aratika within the room of Srila Prabhupada each morning. Sometimes Prabhupada would appreciate the singing and sometimes not. Later on in the morning after a particularly bad kirtan, Prabhupada called me into his room and complained about the singing. He said, again, more or less, << I did not like the singing in the morning. The morning melody must be sung throughout the mangala aratika and no other melody should be sung. It should be sung sweetly and melodiously, like this ... [and he proceeded to sing the first verse of the samsara prayer in a very sweet and melodious voice with perfect inflection and musical accent]. >> Prabhupada was very insistent that the singing should be done in that way only. He indicated that he wanted me to lead the kirtans in the morning as a way to establish the standards within the temple. –Harikesa Swami
We have Srila Prabhupada’s recorded instruction: “This is the morning tune.”
If you ask me, “double-timing” the melody takes all the charm out of it. (I mean speeding it up and taking all the stops and rests out of it, making it sound something like a march.)
By the way: The morning tune is not to be sung in the evening.
Jaya Radhe
The next morning I led the kirtan in his room duplicating the melodious style which he had shown me the day before [for the morning tune]. Prabhupada was pleased and seemed to enjoy the kirtan. Unfortunately I fell victim to that demon within the mind and started to speculate a couple of “Jaya radhe’s” at the end of the kirtan. This was one of the bigger mistakes made by me at that time. Although there is nothing wrong with “Jaya radhe”, Prabhupada simply didn’t want us to chant it. He once explained that Sukadeva Gosvami did not feel himself qualified to chant the name of Radha in the Srimad-bhagavatam and therefore only indicated her name with the word “aradhana” while describing the topmost gopi friend of Krsna.
Anyway, to continue the story, I had just started to chant Srimati Radharani’s holy name within Vrindavan dham, Her beloved Lord’s abode, within the presence of Her most intimate devotee, during the most auspicious hours of the day, when Her most intimate devotee looked at me with eyes blazing like fire and desirous of initiating my immediate destruction. Voice choked and gagging, I ended the kirtan immediately without further formalities, never again to make the same mistake. Prabhupada never ended kirtans with various extra mantras, especially not “Jaya radhe”, so why should I? –Harikesa Swami
Srila Prabhupada didn’t chant it. And his response when people on his morning walk in Vrindaban greeted him with “Jaya Radhe”?
“Hare Krsna.”
February 12, 2010
Kirtan Reform Workshop by Jayadvaita Swami, part 1
Disclaimer
In this seminar I’ll have some fairly negative comments to make about various things people do in modern ISKCON kirtana.
Practically all of my friends, all the devotees I most admire, and all my favorite kirtana leaders regularly do one or another of these things.
So I don’t intend to attack anyone personally or insinuate that anyone is spiritually defective.
Please don’t think if your guru does something you hear about in my seminar you have to ditch him and look for someone else.
But I wouldn’t mind if some of these features of modern ISKCON kirtana came up for review.
And at least I can hope that this seminar will help make the world safe for devotees who may not always want to do things the modern ISKCON way.
There are standards
It’s our premise here that Srila Prabhupada did give us standards to follow in kirtana. It’s not that we all have to do everything precisely as in the 1960’s and 70’s. But it’s not that “anything goes.”
There are standards, there are instructions, and we should know them.
“Keep it pure” (MP3 from Krpamoya)
Purity of consciousness
A bona fide spiritual master chants the holy names -- Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare/ Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare -- and the transcendental sound vibration enters into the ear of the disciple, and if a disciple follows in the footsteps of his spiritual master and chants the holy name with similar respect, he actually comes to worship the transcendental name.
When the transcendental name is worshiped by the devotee, the name Himself spreads His glories within the heart of a devotee. When a devotee is perfectly qualified in chanting the transcendental vibration of the holy name, he is quite fit to become a spiritual master and to deliver all the people of the world. The chanting of the holy name is so powerful that it gradually establishes its supremacy above everything in the world. The devotee who chants it becomes transcendentally situated in ecstasy and sometimes laughs, cries and dances in his ecstasy.
Sometimes the unintelligent put hindrances in the path of chanting this maha-mantra, but one who is situated on the platform of love of Godhead chants the holy name loudly for all concerned. As a result, everyone becomes initiated in the chanting of the holy names -- Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare/ Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare. By chanting and hearing the holy names of Krsna, a person can remember the forms and qualities of Krsna.
--TLC, Chapter 18: The Conversations with Prakasananda (last words of the chapter)
From the Acaryas, not cinema songs or bhajanas from the street
“These prayers [offered by Brahma to Lord Visnu] were not ordinary concocted prayers. Prayers must be approved by Vedic literature, as indicated in this verse by the words daivibhir girbhih. In our Krsna consciousness movement we do not allow any song that has not been approved or sung by bona fide devotees. We cannot allow cinema songs to be sung in the temple.
We generally sing two songs. One is sri-krsna-caitanya prabhu nityananda sri-advaita gadadhara srivasadi-gaura-bhakta-vrnda. This is bona fide. It is always mentioned in the Caitanya-caritamrta, and it is accepted by the acaryas. The other, of course, is the maha-mantra—Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare/ Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare. We may also sing the songs of Narottama dasa Thakura, Bhaktivinoda Thakura and Locana dasa Thakura, but these two songs—“sri-krsna-caitanya” and the Hare Krsna maha-mantra—are sufficient to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead, although we cannot see Him.
--SB 8.5.25, purport
In our temple, strictly Hare Krishna chanting should be given more importance. There is no harm in this mantra you have heard, but it is not very important. There are many such common songs composed by common devotees out of sentiment. But our principle is to stick to the authorities, and always remember that Hare Krishna is the prime authorized mantra. –letter to Malati, 28 January, 1969
There are sahajiyas who, not knowing the importance of the Panca-tattva, concoct their own slogans, such as bhaja nitai gaura, radhe syama, japa hare krsna hare rama or sri-krsna-caitanya prabhu-nityananda hare krsna hare rama sri-radhe govinda. Such chants may be good poetry, but they cannot help us to go forward in devotional service. In such chants there are also many discrepancies, which need not be discussed here.
Strictly speaking, when chanting the names of the Panca-tattva, one should fully offer his obeisances: sri-krsna-caitanya prabhu-nityananda sri-advaita gadadhara srivasadi-gaura-bhakta-vrnda. By such chanting one is blessed with the competency to chant the Hare Krsna maha-mantra without offense. When chanting the Hare Krsna maha-mantra, one should also chant it fully: Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare/ Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare.
One should not foolishly adopt any of the slogans concocted by imaginative devotees. If one actually wants to derive the effects of chanting, one must strictly follow the great acaryas. This is confirmed in the Mahabharata: maha-jano yena gatah sa panthah. "The real path of progress is that which is traversed by great acaryas and authorities." –Cc. Adi 7.168
"One devotee had picked up a chant in India: he krsna, govinda, hari, murari/ he natha, narayana, vasudeva. When Prabhupada heard it, he called us into his room and said, 'This is not a Vedic mantra; this is a cinema song. An intelligent disciple just takes whatever his spiritual master provides for him, considering that to be sufficient. There are many names of God you can chant, but it's best to take what comes in disciplic succession and what the spiritual master introduces.' "
--Revatinandana Dasa, quoted in "Srila Prabhupada and His Disciples in Germany," page 192
We cannot follow an upstart, manufacturing some song. What is authorized song, we shall sing.
--lecture, Vrndavana, November 13, 1972
Authorized songs means the songs which were sung or composed by self-realized Acaryas. It is an injunction in the Vaisnava regulations that unauthorized songs or statements should never be heard. The comparison is given that milk, although very nutritious food, if it is touched by the tongue of a serpent, it acts like poison. –letter to Syamasundara, 25 Feb 1970
One should chant the bona fide songs received from the disciplic succession. In Bhagavad-gétä it is said that the chanting is powerful when one follows the disciplic succession (evaà paramparä-präptam imaà räjarñayo viduù). Manufacturing many ways of chanting will never be effective. However, chanting the song or the narration left by the previous äcäryas (mahäjano yena gataù sa panthäù) is extremely effective, and this process is very easy. --SB 7.9.18 purport
February 10, 2010
The Personal Aspect of the Absolute According to Gaudia Vaishnavism by Madhva das
The Quest for Knowledge
We want to know. We ask questions. Then we take a long journey in search for the answers.The quest for knowledge begins…
The Labels
As we advance, exploring and mapping the unknown, we label the things we find.We label anything and everything already known.Of course we label the labels too. In modernphilosophythese labels are called “terms”. Bereft of the “solid ground” of the experimental science, philosophy isfacingits own difficulties while advancing and mapping its new territories. The abstract nature of philosophy has provided unique challenges in regardto the terms it introduces. Throughout history many big, big debates havearisen over what certainterms designate. Some of these debates seem to have been blessed with immortality.
A new term was introduced into Western philosophy in the fifteenth century by Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464)
The “Absolute”
The root comes from the Latin absolutus, the perfect or the completed (derived from the verbum absolvere, to detach, to free, to acquit).The absolute is the ultimate, underlying and all-inclusive reality that depends upon nothing else for its existence. All other things depend upon it. The absolute is substance as it is, rather than as we perceive it.Thus we can't really know conceptually and logically what the Absolute is, because the Absolute by its very nature transcends the mind and the mental concepts.
While inthe West it took quite a while for the word Absolute to make its way intocommon vocabulary, in the East, particularly in the Vedic traditionthe term has alwaysbeenaround. In Sanskritit’s called Brahman. There are yet otherrelated Sanskritterms which will be introduced shortly.
The Absolute in the Vedas
The Vedas, particularly Vedanta Sutra and the Upanishads deal exclusively and extensively with Brahman.
Paradox
But howcould the Vedaspossibly describe Brahman? After all, the Absolute is inaccessible to designation. The Vedas are full of qualitative descriptions, but Brahman is, without qualities. Obviously, a metaphor based on similar qualities cannot apply in the case of something that has no qualities. Brahman is beyond all causes and effects. Having no connection with any manifest existence, subtle or gross, the Absolute cannot be expressed by either a meaning derived etymologically, orby a metaphor, since both require some relationship of Brahman to other entities.
At this point, before we can continue any further we need to look closer at the definition of Brahman in the texts of the Vedas.
The Three Aspects of the Absolute
“Learned transcendentalists who know the Absolute Truth call this nondual substance Brahman, ParamatmaorBhagavan.”(BhagavataPurana 1.2.11)
Vaishnava Vedanta Purport
The Absolute Truth is both subject and object, and there is no qualitative difference there. Therefore, Brahman, Paramatmaand Bhagavan are qualitatively one and the same. The same substance is realized as impersonal Brahman by the students of the Upanishads, as localized Paramatmaby the yogis, and as Bhagavan by the Vaishnavadevotees. In other words, Bhagavan, or the Personality of Godhead, is the last word of the Absolute Truth. Paramatmais the partial representation of the Personality of Godhead, and impersonal Brahman is the glowing effulgence of the Personality of Godhead, as the sun rays are to the sun-god. Less intelligent students of either of the above schools sometimes argue in favor of their own respective realization, but those who are perfect seers of the Absolute Truth know well that the above three features of the one Absolute Truth are different perspective views seen from different angles of vision.
The Supreme Truth is self-sufficient, cognizant and free from the illusion of relativity. In the relative world the knower is different from the known, but in the Absolute Truth both the knower and the known are one and the same thing. In the relative world the knower is the living spirit or superior energy, whereas the known is inert matter or inferior energy. Therefore, there is a duality of inferior and superior energy, whereas in the absolute realm both the knower and the known are of the same superior energy. There are three kinds of energies of the supreme energetic. There is no difference between the energy and energetic, but there is a difference of quality of energies. The absolute realm and the living entities are of the same superior energy, but the material world is inferior energy. The living being in contact with the inferior energy is illusioned, thinking he belongs to the inferior energy. Therefore there is the sense of relativity in the material world. In the Absolute there is no such sense of difference between the knower and the known, and therefore everything there is absolute.
Solving the Paradox
Now that we have introduced the key Sanskrit terms from the Vedas, concerning the Absolute, we have sufficient vocabulary to proceed with our analysis of the paradox, in accordance with the GaudiaVaishnava philosophy. IsBrahmanreally indescribable by words?IfBhagavan had not created the intelligence, mind and senses, then sound and the other objects of perception would all be just as indescribable as Brahman. We would have been blind and deaf since birth, and would know nothing about physical forms and sounds, what to speak of the Absolute. So, just as Bhagavan has given us all faculties of perception for experiencing and describing to others the sensations of sight, sound and so forth, He may also give someone the receptive capacity to realize Brahman. He may, if He chooses, create some extraordinary way for words to function - apart from their ordinary references to material substances, qualities, categories and actions - that will enable them to express the Supreme Truth. He is, after all, the almighty Bhagavan, and He can easily make the indescribable describable.
And yet there are different Vedic schools rejecting one another’s understanding of the Vedic texts. Specifically, the definition of the Absolute, is the core of anexistential question of immenseimportance; a question which has triggered numerous debates among the Western philosophers as well as in the circles of the Vedic pundits; a question expressing our deepest doubts about our very nature.We just arrived at the very epicenter of what has been an epic dilemmasince time immemorial for those among the mortals who dared to ask for immortality.
Is the Absolute Personal or Impersonal?
In accordance with the Vedic tradition the answer should be searched in the Vedas.
There is a school which considersbrahmanto be impersonal.Analyzing the Vedas, they apply a logical approach, known as gaunavrittiorlaksana-vritti. This is the Advaitaschool of thought.
The school which describesbrahmanas personal,applies a different logical approach known as mukhyavrittior abidha.This is the Vaishnava school. It has several branches. The main areDvaita, Vishishtadvaita, Dvaitādvaita, Shuddhadvaita and AchintyaBhedābheda. The last in the list is the technical term for the GaudiaVaishnava philosophy.
Both schools base their conclusionson the same Vedic scriptures, namely Vedanta Sutra, the Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita and for the Vaishnava school, additionally -BhagavataPurana.Nevertheless, toreach different conclusions after applying different logical systems of interpretation is not very surprising.
Direct and Indirect Meaning
The different ways a word refers to its meaning are distinguished as mukhya-vritti, lakshana-vritti and gauna-vritti. The sabda-vritti termed mukhya is the primary, literal meaning of a word; this is also known as abhidha, a word's "denotation," or dictionary meaning. Mukhya-vritti is further divided into two subcategories, namely rudhi and yoga. A primary meaning is called rudhi when it is based on conventional usage, and yoga when it is derived from another word's meaning by regular etymological rules. For example, the word go ("cow") is an example of rudhi, since its relation with its literal meaning is purely conventional. The denotation of the word pacaka ("chef"), on the other hand, is a yoga-vritti, through the word's derivation from the root pac ("to cook") by addition of the agent suffix -ka.
Beside its mukhya-vritti, or primary meaning, a word can also be used in a secondary, metaphorical sense. This usage is calledlakshana. The rule is that a word should not be understood metaphorically if its mukhya-vritti makes sense in the given context; only after the mukhya-vrittifails to convey a word's meaning may lakshana-vrittibe justifiably presumed. The function of lakshana is technically explained in the kavya-sastras as an extended reference, pointing to something in some way related to the object of the literal meaning. Thus, the phrase gangayamghoshah literally means "the cowherd village in the Ganges." But that idea is absurd, so here gangayam should rather be understood by its lakshana to mean "on the bank of the Ganges," the bank being something related to the river.Gauna-vritti is a special kind of lakshana, where the meaning is extended to some idea of similarity. For example, in the statement simhodevadattah ("Devadatta is a lion"), heroic Devadatta is metaphorically called a lion because of his lionlike qualities. In contrast, the example of the general kind of lakshana, namely gangayamghoshah, involves a relationship not of similarity but of location.
The Arguments
The authority of the Vedas is unchallengeable and stands without any question of doubt. Whatever is stated in the Vedas must be accepted completely; otherwise one challenges the authority of the Vedas.The Vedic injunctions are self-authorized, and if some mundane creature adjusts the interpretations of the Vedas, he defies their authority. Here the indirect interpretation (lakshana-vritti) serves no purpose. There are four kinds of understanding, called: (1) direct perception (pratyaksha), (2) hypothetical understanding and reasoning (anumana), (3) historical understanding (aitihya) and (4) understanding through sound (sabda). Of these four, understanding from the Vedic scriptures (which are the sound representations of the Absolute Truth) is the best method. The traditional Vedic students accept understanding through sound to be the best. Thus theGaudiaVaishnavasprotest against misinterpretations of the Upanishads, and reject any explanation which do not give the direct meaning of the Upanishads.They are simply not Vedic. The Vedic statements of the Upanishads are like sunlight. Everything is clear and very distinct when it is seen in the sunlight; the statements of the Vedas are similarly clear and distinct. The philosophers, attached to their own doctrine are trying to expound it through the codes of Vedanta-sutra, with the means of laksana-vritti,but they simply cover the sunlight with the cloud of misinterpretation.
The Choice
In the light of the above presentation, now we can revise the formulation of the question:Is the Absolute Personal or Impersonal?
As it was already demonstrated, fromthe GaudiaVaishnava standpoint the question actuallyis: Am I going to interact with the personal aspect of the Absolute, Bhagavan, or am I going to focus on His effulgence, the impersonalBrahman?
Once the mind rises to the conceptof the Absolute, this is a personal choice nobody can avoid.
The GaudiaVaishnavaPhilosophy in Nutshell
1. The Vedic literature is the only source of knowledge about the Absolute Truth.
2. Hari (Krishna), the Almighty, is the Supreme Lord.
3. Krishna is always invested with infinite powers.
4. Krishna is the ocean of rasa(mellows of love).
5. The soul is Krishna’s separated part.
6. Certain souls are engrossed by Krishna’s illusory energy (Maya).
7. Certain souls are released from Krishna’s illusory energy.
8. All spiritual and material phenomena are simultaneously one with and different from Krishna.
9. Pure devotional service is the only means for attaining the final objective of life.
10. Pure love of Godhead is the final objective of life.
Epilog
The GaudiaVaishnava philosophy is an interpretation of the ultimate reality as being itself personal in character and of such a kind as to allow for the dependent reality of finite persons. Personality is constituted by unity of self-consciousness, and every being who is conscious of its identity, a lasting I, existing in itself and knowing of itself, is a person. Although, because of the flowing nature of his consciousness, man may doubt his own personality, the “true identity” of the subject, it is not possible to doubt the personality of God once we have ascribed conscious identity to him. If we do not want to relinquish everything conceivable, we must perforce acknowledge that “the highest intelligence” also possesses the “highest degree of personality”. It is therefore not true that man’s personality is ascertainable while God’s is not, that God is less personal than man. The opposite is the case.The GaudiaVaishnava Philosophy defends the status and the moral freedom of the individual, the moral values of the ordered community of persons, and the personality and transcendence of the Absolute or the God, according to the preferred terminology.Our experience as persons – our experience of personality in ourselves, as freedom, emotions, intelligence, and will – is indicative of God’s personality. If God’s personality is denied, the result will be that man will elevate his own personality to the position of God and worship himself. Man’s grounding of himself in himself alone is nothingness or self-deification, the ‘conceit of omnipotence’. In a putative religion of secular people who make themselves God, everyone has a divinized nature and no longer needs to turn toward the real God. They are gods and goddesses who can worship themselves as they like, until they die.
The End
Everyone is qualified for bhakti
Srimad Bhagavatam 2.9.36, purport:
The lowest of human beings can be elevated to the highest stage of devotional life if they are trained by the bona fide spiritual master well versed in the transcendental loving service of the Lord. If the lowest can be so elevated, then what to speak of the highest, who are well versed in the Vedic knowledge? The conclusion is that devotional service to the Lord is open for all, regardless of who they are. That is the confirmation of its application for all kinds of performers of the service.
Therefore the devotional service of the Lord with perfect knowledge through the training of a bona fide spiritual master is advised for everyone, even if one happens not to be a human being. This is confirmed in the Garuda Purana as follows:
"Even the worms, birds and beasts are assured of elevation to the highest perfectional life if they are completely surrendered to the transcendental loving service of the Lord, so what to speak of the philosophers amongst the human beings?"
Therefore there is no need to seek properly qualified candidates for discharging devotional service to the Lord. Let them be either well behaved or ill trained, let them be either learned or fools, let them be either grossly attached or in the renounced order of life, let them be liberated souls or desirous of salvation, let them be inexpert in the discharge of devotional service or expert in the same, all of them can be elevated to the supreme position by discharging devotional service under the proper guidance. This is also confirmed in the Bhagavad-gita (9.30, 32) as follows:
api cet su-duräcäro
bhajate mäm ananya-bhäk
sädhur eva sa mantavyaù
samyag vyavasito hi saù
mäà hi pärtha vyapäçritya
ye 'pi syuù päpa-yonayaù
striyo vaiçyäs tathä çüdräs
te 'pi yänti paräà gatim
Even if a person is fully addicted to all sorts of sinful acts, if he happens to be engaged in the loving transcendental service of the Lord under proper guidance, he is to be considered the most perfect holy man without a doubt. And thus any person, whatsoever and whosoever he or she may be—even the fallen woman, the less intelligent laborer, the dull mercantile man, or even a man lower than all these—can attain the highest perfection of life by going back home, back to Godhead, provided he or she takes shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord in all earnestness. This sincere earnestness is the only qualification that can lead one to the highest perfectional stage of life, and unless and until such real earnestness is aroused, there is a difference between cleanliness or uncleanliness, learning or nonlearning, in the material estimation. Fire is always fire, and thus if someone touches the fire, knowingly or unknowingly, the fire will act in its own way without discrimination.
February 7, 2010
Srila Prabhupada analogies
Just as a bee is always interested in the honey in the flower and does not consider the thorns and colors, highly qualified persons, who are uncommon, accept only the good qualities of others, not considering their bad qualities, whereas the common man can judge what are good qualities and what are bad qualities. (SB 4.4.12, purport)
Those who are offenders at the lotus feet of a great personality dry up; their godly qualities diminish. A great soul may forgive offenses, but Kåñëa does not excuse offenses to the dust of that great soul's feet, just as one can tolerate the scorching sunshine on one's head but cannot tolerate the scorching sunshine on one's feet. (SB 4.4.13, purport)
The mode of ignorance, or tamo-guëa, is considered very much lower than the others, but in the higher sense it is also auspicious. The example may be given herein that the government has both an educational department and criminal department. An outsider may consider the criminal department inauspicious, but from the government's point of view it is as important as the education department, and therefore the government finances both departments equally, without discrimination. (SB 4.6.43, purport)
If a particular part of the body is diseased, the whole attention of the body goes to that part. Similarly, devotees care for any person who is forgetful of Kåñëa and therefore in material consciousness. (SB 4.7.53, purport)
The Lord is described herein as lotus eyed (padma-paläça-locanät). When a person is fatigued, if he sees a lotus flower all his fatigue can be immediately reduced to nil. Similarly, when an aggrieved person sees the lotus face of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, immediately all his grief is reduced. (SB 4.8.23, purport)
those who are elevated to the higher planetary systems must come down again as soon as the results of their pious activities are exhausted. They are like the modern astronauts who go to the moon; as soon as their fuel is used up, they are obliged to come back down to this earth. As the modern astronauts who go to the moon or other heavenly planets by force of jet propulsion have to come down again after exhausting their fuel, so also do those who are elevated to the heavenly planets by force of yajïas and pious activities. (SB 4.9.10, purport)
Devotional service does not change. The example of a mango can be given here. If one gets an unripe mango, it is still a mango, and when it is ripe it remains the same mango, but it has become more tasteful and relishable. Similarly, there is devotional service performed according to the direction of the spiritual master and the injunctions and regulative principles of çästra, and there is devotional service in the spiritual world, rendered directly in association with the Supreme Personality of Godhead. But they are both the same. There is no change. The difference is that one stage is unripe and the other is ripe and more relishable. It is possible to mature in devotional service only in the association of devotees. (SB 4.9.11, purport)
How to attain mystic perfection
SRIMAD BHAGAVATAM 11.15.19-20:
That purified living entity who fixes his mind on the extraordinary sound vibrations occurring within Me as the personified sky and total life air is then able to perceive within the sky the speaking of all living entities.
Commentary by Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura:
By meditating on the transcendental sound vibration, omkara, one can achieve the mystic perfection of being able to hear the words of the living entities that are spread in the sky.
Purport by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura:
In the ekayana worship of the paramahamsas, chanting the Holy Name of the Lord is considered to be the most important activity. It is the duty of all living entities to receive the transcendental sound vibration of the Absolute Truth. When all words are aimed at glorifying the Supreme Lord, one becomes able to hear the speech originating from liberated living entities far beyond the material universe. Liberated souls can visualize reality simply by the reception of the transcendental sound vibration.
Merging one's sight into the sun planet and then the sun planet into one's eyes, one should meditate on Me as existing within the combination of sun and vision; thus one acquires the power to see any distant thing.
Commentary by Srila Visvanatha Cakravarta Thakura:
There is an intimate relationship between the sun and the process of vision. The two are inseparable and are pervaded by the presence of the Supreme Lord in His all-pervading feature as the Supersoul. Here the process of attaining the mystic perfection that enables one to see objects even though very distant is being described.
Purport by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura:
While casting one’s glance upon Lord Narayana as He is situated within the sun globe, if, in reciprocation, one receives the auspicious glance of the Lord, one will see through purified vision that the objects of this world are meant for the Lord’s enjoyment, and not for one’s personal sense gratification. Without receiving the Lord’s glance, one will see the world as either meant for one’s enjoyment, or as an object of dry renunciation.
That purified living entity who fixes his mind on the extraordinary sound vibrations occurring within Me as the personified sky and total life air is then able to perceive within the sky the speaking of all living entities.
Commentary by Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura:
By meditating on the transcendental sound vibration, omkara, one can achieve the mystic perfection of being able to hear the words of the living entities that are spread in the sky.
Purport by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura:
In the ekayana worship of the paramahamsas, chanting the Holy Name of the Lord is considered to be the most important activity. It is the duty of all living entities to receive the transcendental sound vibration of the Absolute Truth. When all words are aimed at glorifying the Supreme Lord, one becomes able to hear the speech originating from liberated living entities far beyond the material universe. Liberated souls can visualize reality simply by the reception of the transcendental sound vibration.
Merging one's sight into the sun planet and then the sun planet into one's eyes, one should meditate on Me as existing within the combination of sun and vision; thus one acquires the power to see any distant thing.
Commentary by Srila Visvanatha Cakravarta Thakura:
There is an intimate relationship between the sun and the process of vision. The two are inseparable and are pervaded by the presence of the Supreme Lord in His all-pervading feature as the Supersoul. Here the process of attaining the mystic perfection that enables one to see objects even though very distant is being described.
Purport by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura:
While casting one’s glance upon Lord Narayana as He is situated within the sun globe, if, in reciprocation, one receives the auspicious glance of the Lord, one will see through purified vision that the objects of this world are meant for the Lord’s enjoyment, and not for one’s personal sense gratification. Without receiving the Lord’s glance, one will see the world as either meant for one’s enjoyment, or as an object of dry renunciation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)